Comparison between alternative literature survey methodologies
| Method | ||
|---|---|---|
| Reading | Topic modeling | |
| A. Assumptions | ||
| Categories are known | Yes/No* | No |
| Relevant text features are known | No | Yes |
| Mapping is known | No | No |
| Coding can be automated | No | Yes |
| B. Costs | ||
| Pre-analysis costs | ||
| Person-hours spent conceptualizing | Low | Low |
| Level of substantive knowledge | Moderate/high | Low |
| Analysis costs | ||
| Person hours spent per text | High | Low |
| Level of substantive knowledge | Moderate/high | Low |
| Post-analysis costs | ||
| Person-hours spent interpreting | High | Moderate |
| Level of substantive knowledge | High | High |
| Method | ||
|---|---|---|
| Reading | Topic modeling | |
| Categories are known | Yes/No* | No |
| Relevant text features are known | No | Yes |
| Mapping is known | No | No |
| Coding can be automated | No | Yes |
| Person-hours spent conceptualizing | Low | Low |
| Level of substantive knowledge | Moderate/high | Low |
| Person hours spent per text | High | Low |
| Level of substantive knowledge | Moderate/high | Low |
| Person-hours spent interpreting | High | Moderate |
| Level of substantive knowledge | High | High |
Note(s): *Yes, when the analysis is based on a pre-defined framework; No when a new theoretical framework needs to be developed
Source(s): Adapted from Asmussen and Møller (2019)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.