Evolution in the use of lean tools
| “Shah and ward” model | 2012 (169) | 2015 (100) | 2018 (85) | Use significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Lean tools | Use | Use | Use | |
| Pull | Kanban | 24% | 30% | 37% | 0.11 |
| Flow | VSM | 18% | 62% | 61% | 0.001* |
| Specific lines | 38% | 59% | 67% | 0.001* | |
| Visual control | 51% | 77% | 82% | 0.001* | |
| Setup | SMED | 31% | 41% | 48% | 0.02* |
| 5S | 48% | 67% | 68% | 0.001* | |
| TPM | TPM | 59% | 74% | 67% | 0.03* |
| Standardised work | 80% | 86% | 67% | 0.007* | |
| SPC | Six sigma | 13% | 22% | 13% | 0.13 |
| EMPINV | Continuous improvement | 50% | 46% | 57% | 0.3 |
| Task integration | 56% | 58% | 65% | 0.34 | |
| “Shah and ward” model | 2012 (169) | 2015 (100) | 2018 (85) | Use significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Lean tools | Use | Use | Use | |
| Pull | Kanban | 24% | 30% | 37% | 0.11 |
| Flow | VSM | 18% | 62% | 61% | 0.001* |
| Specific lines | 38% | 59% | 67% | 0.001* | |
| Visual control | 51% | 77% | 82% | 0.001* | |
| Setup | SMED | 31% | 41% | 48% | 0.02* |
| 5S | 48% | 67% | 68% | 0.001* | |
| TPM | TPM | 59% | 74% | 67% | 0.03* |
| Standardised work | 80% | 86% | 67% | 0.007* | |
| SPC | Six sigma | 13% | 22% | 13% | 0.13 |
| EMPINV | Continuous improvement | 50% | 46% | 57% | 0.3 |
| Task integration | 56% | 58% | 65% | 0.34 | |
Note(s): *Statistical significance
Source(s): Authors work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.