Evolution in the level of internalisation of lean tools
| “Shah and ward” model | 2012 (169) | 2015 (100) | 2018 (85) | Internalisation significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Lean tools | Internalisation level: 1-2-3 | Internalisation level: 1-2-3 | Internalisation level: 1-2-3 | |
| Pull | Kanban | 2.28 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 0.59 |
| Flow | Value stream mapping | 2.07 | 2.17 | 2.27 | 0.63 |
| Specific lines | 2.45 | 2.46 | 2.52 | 0.68 | |
| Visual control | 2.45 | 2.37 | 2.45 | 0.88 | |
| Setup | SMED | 2.16 | 2.13 | 2.34 | 0.29 |
| 5S | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.13 | 0.051 | |
| TPM | TPM | 2.26 | 2.29 | 2.39 | 0.23 |
| Standardised work | 2.57 | 2.51 | 2.41 | 0.53 | |
| SPC | Six sigma | 2.1 | 1.95 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| EMPINV | Continuous improvement | 2.24 | 2.2 | 1.84 | 0.14 |
| Task integration | 2.41 | 2.44 | 2.31 | 0.25 | |
| “Shah and ward” model | 2012 (169) | 2015 (100) | 2018 (85) | Internalisation significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Lean tools | Internalisation level: 1-2-3 | Internalisation level: 1-2-3 | Internalisation level: 1-2-3 | |
| Pull | Kanban | 2.28 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 0.59 |
| Flow | Value stream mapping | 2.07 | 2.17 | 2.27 | 0.63 |
| Specific lines | 2.45 | 2.46 | 2.52 | 0.68 | |
| Visual control | 2.45 | 2.37 | 2.45 | 0.88 | |
| Setup | SMED | 2.16 | 2.13 | 2.34 | 0.29 |
| 5S | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.13 | 0.051 | |
| TPM | TPM | 2.26 | 2.29 | 2.39 | 0.23 |
| Standardised work | 2.57 | 2.51 | 2.41 | 0.53 | |
| SPC | Six sigma | 2.1 | 1.95 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| EMPINV | Continuous improvement | 2.24 | 2.2 | 1.84 | 0.14 |
| Task integration | 2.41 | 2.44 | 2.31 | 0.25 | |
Source(s): Authors work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.