The results of ANOVA
| Mean value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Light adopters (N = 58) | Moderate adopters (N = 90) | Heavy adopters (N = 67) | F value |
| Relative advantage | 4.57 | 4.54 | 4.61 | 0.29 |
| Complexity | 3.50 | 3.47 | 3.19 | 1.66 |
| Compatibility | 3.53 | 3.64 | 3.86 | 2.55 |
| Top management support | 4.14 | 4.34 | 4.52 | 4.19* |
| Technology competence | 3.38 | 3.63 | 4.14 | 12.76*** |
| Government support | 4.34 | 4.39 | 4.59 | 2.99* |
| Competitive pressure | 3.97 | 4.19 | 4.34 | 3.96* |
| Labor cost | 4.24 | 4.43 | 4.18 | 2.44 |
| Mean value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Light adopters (N = 58) | Moderate adopters (N = 90) | Heavy adopters (N = 67) | F value |
| Relative advantage | 4.57 | 4.54 | 4.61 | 0.29 |
| Complexity | 3.50 | 3.47 | 3.19 | 1.66 |
| Compatibility | 3.53 | 3.64 | 3.86 | 2.55 |
| Top management support | 4.14 | 4.34 | 4.52 | 4.19* |
| Technology competence | 3.38 | 3.63 | 4.14 | 12.76*** |
| Government support | 4.34 | 4.39 | 4.59 | 2.99* |
| Competitive pressure | 3.97 | 4.19 | 4.34 | 3.96* |
| Labor cost | 4.24 | 4.43 | 4.18 | 2.44 |
Note(s): * Significant at 0.05; *** Significant at 0.001
Source(s): Authors work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.