Criteria for the agency status 1992–2018
| Agencies should have | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cr. 1 | Cr. 2 | Cr. 3 | Cr. 4 | Cr. 5 | Cr. 6 |
| A specific governance model | Measurable products and services | An administration capable of producing specific management criteria | Full cost information and cost systems | Performance and efficiency measurement | To comply with other criteria | |
| 1992–1994 | X | ● | X | X | ● | X |
| 19951 | X | ● in quantity and quality | ●2 based on accrual accounting | X by insight in budgeted and actual costs of production3 | ● a real option to work more efficiently must exist | X |
| 19984 | ● entity should have an external system of planning and control, connected to an internal system of planning and control | ● based on described business processes | ● based on accrual accounting5 | ● explicitly related to Cr. 2 | ● by using full cost information per product or service and one or more specified quality indicators | X |
| 20006 | ● entity should have an external system of planning and control, connected to an internal system of planning and control | ● based on described business processes | ● based on accrual accounting, agency has to comply with three conditions | ● | ● by using full cost information per product or service and one or more specified quality indicators | ● an executed scenery analysis7 |
| 20028 | ● by an available external system of planning and control, connected to an internal system of planning and control | ● based on described business processes | ● based on accrual accounting, agency has to comply with five conditions | ● | ● by using full cost information per product or service and one or more specified quality indicators | ● an executed scenery analysis, showing all organizations having a governance relation with the agency |
| Implicating governance and budgeting on quality, quantity and full costs | Application of risk management | |||||
| 20079 | ● contractualism and result-based steering, including incentives to more efficient production | ● | ● based on accrual accounting, compliant with five conditions | ● calculating with all costs (direct and indirect) | ● by using - agreements in advance and afterward about performance - audits and benchmarking - full cost information (long- run development) | X |
| 201110 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | X |
| 201211 | ● contractualism and result-based steering, including incentives to more efficient production | ● | ● based on accrual accounting or cash accounting | X (only linking financial expenditures to performances) | ● by producing more efficiently than under its former status demonstrating how this will be achieved over the next five years | ● a business volume of more than € 50 mln a sufficient level of quality of the financial profession and management |
| 201812 | ● contractualism and result-based steering, including incentives to more efficient production | ● | ● based on accrual accounting, but only when there is a depreciation rate of at least 5% of the average business volume in the last 3 years, otherwise cash accounting | X linking financial expenditures to performances | ● by producing more efficiently than under its former status demonstrating how this will be achieved over the next five years | ● a business volume of more than € 50 mln a sufficient level of quality of the financial profession and management |
| Agencies should have | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Cr. 1 | Cr. 2 | Cr. 3 | Cr. 4 | Cr. 5 | Cr. 6 |
| A specific governance model | Measurable products and services | An administration capable of producing specific management criteria | Full cost information and cost systems | Performance and efficiency measurement | To comply with other criteria | |
| 1992–1994 | X | ● | X | X | ● | X |
| 19951 | X | ● | ●2 | X by insight in budgeted and actual costs of production3 | ● | X |
| 19984 | ● | ● | ● | ● | X | |
| 20006 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| 20028 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Implicating governance and budgeting on quality, quantity and full costs | Application of risk management | |||||
| 20079 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | X |
| 201110 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | Equal to 2007 | X |
| 201211 | ● | ● | ● | X | ● | ● |
| 201812 | ● | ● | ● | X | ● | ● |
Note(s):● = obligated X = not mentioned
1 Formally described in 1994 by the 6th amendment of the national accountability law: Tweede Kamer, 1993–1994, 23.769, nr.3. Exception is the obligation to use accrual accounting, which was extra amended by the Parliament while debating the 6th amendment: Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1994–1995, 23,796, nr. 39, pp. 2,704–2,705.
2 Secured by a consented auditor's certificate.
3 Full cost information or cost system is not mentioned.
4 Verder met resultaat; het agentschapsmodel 1991–1997, Ministerie van Financiën, April 1998.
5 Only mentioned in the national accountability law.
6 Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1999–2000, 26,541/26,627, nr. 70, 10 februari 2000, pp. 17–19. In fact, the criteria were more specified than in 1998 and presented in this table.
7 A scenery analysis shows the environment of an agency in terms of roles (principal, agent, owner, funder and supervisor) and responsibilities (decision-making, funding and consuming). Hereby, also funding sources and information channels are discussed (refer to Tweede Kamer 1999–2000, 26,541/26,627, 10 februari 2000).
8 Tweede Kamer, 2002–2003, 28,737, nr.1. 16 December 2002.
9 Regeling Baten-Lastendiensten, 2007
10 Regeling Baten-lastendiensten, 2011
11 Regeling Agentschappen 2012
12 Regeling Agentschappen 2017
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.