Comparison of case studies regarding approach and benefits
| FUPBM steps | Case 1 – combat vehicle | Case 2 – naval radar | Case 3 – helicopter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Monitoring | User registration of mission types and duration | User registration of mission types/phases and duration | User registration of saline flight hours (FHs) |
| 2. Usage profiles | High level: mission types Lower level: surface type and terrain roughness | High level: mission types Lower level: vibrations, temp. changes | High level: fraction saline FHs |
| 3. Quantifying severities | A. Component level B. Expert Opinion | A. Component level B. Phenomenological model | A. System level B. Phenomenological model |
| Benefits | Maintenance of track pads can be adapted to encountered terrain | Number of required spare parts can be adapted to planned mission type | Repair/replacement of safety device MRSLA can be planned more effectively and efficiently |
| FUPBM steps | Case 1 – combat vehicle | Case 2 – naval radar | Case 3 – helicopter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Monitoring | User registration of mission types and duration | User registration of mission types/phases and duration | User registration of saline flight hours (FHs) |
| 2. Usage profiles | High level: mission types | High level: mission types Lower level: vibrations, temp. changes | High level: fraction saline FHs |
| 3. Quantifying severities | A. Component level | A. Component level | A. System level |
| Benefits | Maintenance of track pads can be adapted to encountered terrain | Number of required spare parts can be adapted to planned mission type | Repair/replacement of safety device MRSLA can be planned more effectively and efficiently |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.