Table 5

Frequencies of codes and sub-codes* among students' responses (N = 33) to “How did you interact with your undergraduate mentor during the STEM challenge?”

Main codesDefinitions of emergent sub-codesCodes and sub-coded utterances (N = 47)
Encouragement 1 (2%)
Affective relationship 10 (21%)
 Cool3 (30%)
Funny3 (30%)
Friendly or kind3 (30%)
Played games, told jokes1 (10%)
Generally helpful/supportive 13 (28%)
Answering questions2 (15%)
Helping with basic work related to the build4 (31%)
Procuring supplies0 (0%)
Non-specific in type of help or support7 (54%)
 17 (36%)
Passive collaboration with mentorGiving out ideas, hints, advice, suggestions, or telling students how to conduct the EDP15 (88%)
Providing help on demand (e.g. making measurements)0 (0%)
Rendering assistance when requested (with supplies)0 (0%)
Asking questions guiding the process (no direct involvement)2 (12%)
Active collaboration with mentor 6 (13%)
Teaching (not telling) how to engage in the EDP0 (0%)
Generating ideas and co-creation of understanding2 (33%)
Working with supplies to build, prototype, or troubleshoot EDP2 (33%)
Leveraging content specific questions to guide the process1 (17%)

Note(s): At least 1 sub-code qualified a main code, there were no more than two sub-codes per main code.

*Sub-code percentages reflect the percent total of the code, not all main codes

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal