Table 6

Frequencies of constructs and sub-constructs of students' responses (n = 32) to [overall] “how did you interact with your group during the STEM challenge?”

21st-century skills constructs Definitions of a priori sub-constructsCoded and sub-coded utterances (N = 65)
Collaboration23 (35%)
Assume shared responsibility4 (17%)
Ability to work effectively and respectfully in a team10 (43%)
Flexibility and willingness to compromise for a common goal5 (22%)
aDifficulty in collaboration4 (17%)
Communication10 (15%)
Articulation of thoughts and ideas in various contexts3 (30%)
Effective listening1 (10%)
Communication in diverse environments0 (0%)
Use of a range of communication (e.g. to inform, instruct, persuade)1 (10%)
Use of media and technologies0 (0%)
aDifficulty in communication2 (20%)
bBuilding or reaching consensus3 (30%)
Critical thinking10 (15%)
Solve different kinds of problems in conventional and innovative ways2 (20%)
Identify and ask significant questions that clarify various points of view and lead to better solutions1 (10%)
Use various types of reasoning appropriate to the situation0 (0%)
Use systems thinking (analysis of parts to a whole)0 (0%)
Effectively analyze and evaluate evidence, arguments, claims and beliefs0 (0%)
Analyze and evaluate major alternative points of view3 (30%)
Synthesize and make connections between information and arguments0 (0%)
Interpret information and draw conclusions based on the best analysis2 (20%)
Reflect critically on learning experiences and processes1 (10%)
aDifficulty in critical thinking0 (0%)
bCritical thinking specific to STEM1 (10%)
Creativity22 (34%)
Brainstorming and ideation1 (5%)
New and worthwhile ideas1 (5%)
Elaborate refine and evaluate ideas2 (9%)
Being open, responsive, incorporate group input, feedback into work6 (27%)
Develop, implement, and communicate new ideas to others8 (36%)
Demonstrating originality, inventiveness to real world limits0 (0%)
Viewing failure as opportunity to learn3 (14%)
Acting on creative ideas to create a novel of useful innovation1 (5%)
aDifficulty in creativity0 (0%)

Note(s): There was no response from one participant (N = 32).

*Sub-construct percentages reflect the percent total of the construct, not all constructs

aTo reflect issues reported in the 4Cs, negative codes were established, coded and counted

bSub-constructs are emergent, not reflective of the NEA's framework (2012) of the 4Cs

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal