Table 11

Frequencies of codes and sub-codes* among students' responses (N = 39) to how they interacted with their teacher and undergraduate mentor during the STEM challenge

Main codesDefinitions of emergent sub-codesTeacher mentor (N = 49)Undergrad mentor (N = 53)Mentor totals (N = 102)
Encouragement 4 (8%)10 (19%)14 (14%)
Affective relationship 0 (0%)2 (4%)2 (2%)
Cool011 (50%)
Funny000
Friendly or kind011 (50%)
Played games, told jokes000
Generally helpful/supportive 13 (27%)14 (26%)27 (26%)
Answering questions000
Helping with basic work related to the build448 (30%)
Procuring supplies000
Non-specific in type of help or support91019 (70%)
Passive collaboration with mentor 24 (49%)18 (34%)42 (41%)
Giving out ideas, hints, advice, suggestions or telling students how to conduct the EDP141630 (71%) 
Providing help on demand (e.g. making measurements)011 (2%)
Rendering assistance when requested (with supplies)101 (2%)
Asking questions guiding the process (no direct involvement)9110 (24%)
Active collaboration with mentor 8 (16%)9 (17%)17 (17%)
Teaching (not telling) how to engage in the EDP325 (29%)
Generating ideas and co-creation of understanding123 (18%)
Working with supplies to build, prototype or troubleshoot EDP347 (41%)
Leveraging content specific questions to guide the process112 (12%)

Note(s): At least one sub-code qualified as main code, there were no more than two sub-codes per main code.

*Sub-code percentages reflect the percent total of the code, not all main codes

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal