Table 17

Frequencies of codes and sub-codes* among students' responses (N = 72) to how they interacted with their undergraduate mentor (N = 99) during year one and year two

Main codesDefinitions of emergent sub-codesYear one (N = 46)Year two (N = 53)Year one and two (N = 99)
Encouragement 1 (2%)10 (19%)11 (11%)
Affective relationship 10 (21%)2 (4%)12 (12%)
Cool314 (33%)
Funny303 (25%)
Friendly or kind314 (33%)
Played games, told jokes101 (9%)
Generally helpful/supportive 13 (28%)14 (26%)27 (27%)
Answering questions202 (7%)
Helping with basic work related to the build448 (30%)
Procuring supplies000 (0%)
Non-specific in type of help or support71017 (63%)
Passive collaboration with mentor 17 (36%)18 (34%)35 (36%)
Giving out ideas, hints, advice, suggestions or telling students how to conduct the EDP151631 (89%)
Providing help on demand (e.g. making measurements)011 (3%)
Rendering assistance when requested (with supplies)000 (0%)
Asking questions guiding the process (no direct involvement)213 (8%)
Active collaboration with mentor 5 (11%)9 (17%)14 (14%)
Teaching (not telling) how to engage in the EDP022 (14%)
Generating ideas and co-creation of understanding224 (29%)
Working with supplies to build, prototype or troubleshoot EDP246 (43%)
Leveraging content-specific questions to guide the EDP112 (14%)

Note(s): At least one sub-code qualified as main code, there were no more than two sub-codes per main code.

*Sub-code percentages reflect the percent total of the code, not all main codes

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal