Table 5

Moderator analyses

Moderator (italics) and levelkEffect sizengF95% CIp
Outcome type2063  1.48 0.33
A Affective outcomes5102840.44 −0.14–1.010.10
B1 General perceived efficacy9174010.59 0.30–0.88<0.01
B2 Goal attainment662581.29 0.56–2.01<0.01
C1 Self-reported performance554220.30 −0.22–0.810.18
C2 Other-rated performance8134430.24 0.00–0.480.05
D Workplace psychological well-being6122620.28 0.08–0.490.02
Coaching method2063  0.78 0.54
CBC7154060.39 −0.03–0.820.07
GROW4202510.44 0.18–0.70<0.01
PPC36670.57 0.28–0.850.02
integrative6222330.71 0.21–1.210.02
CBC vs Others2063  0.88 0.37
CBC7154060.39 −0.03-0.820.07
others13485510.55 0.40–0.70<0.01
Single vs Integrative2063  1.83 0.23
single15417240.45 0.27–0.64<0.01
integrative5222330.71 0.21–1.210.02

Note(s): k = number of studies; n = number of correlations; F = HTZ-F test comparing the levels of a given moderator. A = affective outcomes (e.g. organizational commitment, satisfaction and turn over intention); B1 = general perceived efficacy and other cognitive outcomes (e.g. self-awareness, self-efficacy, attribution and self-regulation); B2 = goal-attainment (e.g. goal setting and goal attainment); C1 = self-rated performance; C2 = other-rated performance (e.g. 360-degree multifactor evaluation) and D = workplace well-being (e.g. burn out, stress and anxiety)

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal