Table II.

Importance of port sustainability assessment criteria

Port sustainability assessment criterionMeanaSDbRank
Employee job security and safety4.560.731
Considering environmental protection when handling cargo4.550.712
Facilitating to economic activities4.500.723
Port traffic accidents prevention4.480.704
Ensuring cargo handled safely and effectively4.480.745
Ensuring port area safety and orders4.440.716
Developing approaches against rapid climate change4.430.827
Disposing of effluents4.390.738
Establishing port development funding4.350.779
Maintaining air quality4.330.7610
Strengthening port infrastructure construction4.320.8511
Concerning over benefits of port operators4.310.7012
Offering employment opportunities4.270.7713
Maintaining water quality4.220.8314
Decreasing greenhouse gas emission4.180.8715
Landscape improvement4.160.7616
Encouraging foreign direct investment4.130.8417
Flood avoidance in land side operation area4.070.9118
Avoiding environmental destruction when dredging4.050.8519
Decreasing noise pollution4.040.9020
Using environmental-friendly material in port construction3.970.9221
Encouraging using recyclable material3.960.8622
Supporting tourism industry development3.930.8723
Ecological environment protection in port area3.900.9124
Recognizing requirements of neighboring community3.880.8125
Historic relics protection3.710.9226
Mitigating light influence on neighboring residents3.700.9327
Considering the arrangement of vehicles when constructing port transportation system3.640.8928
Avoiding using unpolluted land in port area3.641.0929
Hiring minority groups3.620.7930
Consulting interests groups when making port projects3.560.8331

Notes:

a

The ratings were based on the mean scores obtained from a Likert scale ranging from 1 (very unimportant) to 5 (very important);

b

SD = standard deviation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options