The contribution of female directors on monitoring tasks
| Monitoring tasks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Spain | Italy | France | ||
| Skewed board (<20% women) | 2.02 (0.39) | |||
| Tilted board (20–33% women) | −2.53 (–0.61) | |||
| Tilted board (>33% women) | 7.50* (1.81) | |||
| Balanced board (>40% women) | 0.03 (0.01) | |||
| Independent directors % | 0.06 (0.52) | 0.33** (2.48) | 0.28** (2.30) | 0.20*** (2.89) |
| CEO duality | −2.33 (−0.50) | 2.94 (0.60) | 4.64 (1.01) | 0.58 (0.21) |
| Board size | 1.49*** (2.29) | −0.59 (−1.10) | −0.39 (−0.75) | 0.75 (1.31) |
| Log (total assets) | 4.07 (1.15) | −1.87 (−0.42) | −4.09 (−0.98) | 21.56*** (4.81) |
| R-squared within | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| R-squared between | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| R-overall | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| N. Obs | 365 | 324 | 324 | 356 |
| N. Firms | 33 | 37 | 37 | 34 |
| Monitoring tasks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Spain | Italy | France | ||
| Skewed board (<20% women) | 2.02 (0.39) | |||
| Tilted board (20–33% women) | −2.53 (–0.61) | |||
| Tilted board (>33% women) | 7.50* (1.81) | |||
| Balanced board (>40% women) | 0.03 (0.01) | |||
| Independent directors % | 0.06 (0.52) | 0.33** (2.48) | 0.28** (2.30) | 0.20*** (2.89) |
| CEO duality | −2.33 (−0.50) | 2.94 (0.60) | 4.64 (1.01) | 0.58 (0.21) |
| Board size | 1.49*** (2.29) | −0.59 (−1.10) | −0.39 (−0.75) | 0.75 (1.31) |
| Log (total assets) | 4.07 (1.15) | −1.87 (−0.42) | −4.09 (−0.98) | 21.56*** (4.81) |
| 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.11 | |
| 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.05 | |
| 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| 365 | 324 | 324 | 356 | |
| 33 | 37 | 37 | 34 | |
Note(s): T-statistics are reported in brackets. *, ** and *** denotes significance at 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively. Robust standard errors clustered at the firm-division level. All tests are two-tailed
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.