FMEA risk mitigation degree ranking
| Degree | Degree in % | Description | Median rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detection is not possible | 0 | Control method(s) cannot or will not detect the existence of a disruption | 10 |
| Very low | 0–50 | Control method(s) probably will not detect the existence of a disruption | 9 |
| Low | 50–60 60–70 | Control method(s) has a poor chance of detecting the existence of a disruption | 8–7 |
| Moderate | 70–80 80–85 | Control method(s) may detect the existence of a disruption | 6–5 |
| High | 85–90 90–95 | Control method(s) has a good chance of detecting the existence of a disruption | 4–3 |
| Very high | 95–100 | Control method(s) will almost certainly detect the existence of a disruption | 2–1 |
| Degree | Degree in % | Description | Median rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detection is not possible | 0 | Control method(s) cannot or will not detect the existence of a disruption | 10 |
| Very low | 0–50 | Control method(s) probably will not detect the existence of a disruption | 9 |
| Low | 50–60 | Control method(s) has a poor chance of detecting the existence of a disruption | 8–7 |
| Moderate | 70–80 | Control method(s) may detect the existence of a disruption | 6–5 |
| High | 85–90 | Control method(s) has a good chance of detecting the existence of a disruption | 4–3 |
| Very high | 95–100 | Control method(s) will almost certainly detect the existence of a disruption | 2–1 |
Source(s): Created by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.