Comparison between the two solutions. Source: authors' elaboration
| First solution | Second solution |
|---|---|
| Simpler | More complex |
| Mix of current and innovative process (off-chain documents and timestamping) | Transformation of information and clauses of the Trust act into code language: use of automated process (smart contract and smart property) |
| No intermediaries other than Oracles (link between real world and blockchain environment) | |
| Tokenization of assets: possibility to sell/rent properties and buy services through tokens | |
| Feasible | Today's technical, social and legal constraints make the implementation futuristic |
| First solution | Second solution |
|---|---|
| Simpler | More complex |
| Mix of current and innovative process (off-chain documents and timestamping) | Transformation of information and clauses of the Trust act into code language: use of automated process (smart contract and smart property) |
| No intermediaries other than Oracles (link between real world and blockchain environment) | |
| Tokenization of assets: possibility to sell/rent properties and buy services through tokens | |
| Feasible | Today's technical, social and legal constraints make the implementation futuristic |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.