Description of H1 variables, tests and results
| ID | Hypothesis | Test | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Post-modern theory is used more than the modern theory in performance evaluation and in optimization and risk budgeting with absolute risk | Chi-square statistic | Hypothesis rejected based on tests in full sample and subsamples | ||
| Tests performed | Hypotdeses | p-value | Sig | Result | |
| T1a | Comparison of the proportions of respondents using modern (θ1) and post-modern (θ2) theory for absolute risk budgeting | h0: θ1 = θ2 h1: θ1 > θ2 | 0.334 | H0 Not Rejected | |
| T1b | Comparison of the proportions of respondents using modern (θ1) and post-modern (θ2) theory for portfolio optimization with absolute risk | h0: θ1 = θ2 h1: θ1 > θ2 | 0.006 | *** | H0 Rejected |
| T1c | Comparison of the proportions of respondents using modern (θ1) and post-Modern (θ2) Theory for performance evaluation | h0: θ1 = θ2 h1: θ1 > θ2 | 0.000 | *** | H0 Rejected |
| ID | Hypothesis | Test | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-modern theory is used more than the modern theory in performance evaluation and in optimization and risk budgeting with absolute risk | Chi-square statistic | Hypothesis rejected based on tests in full sample and subsamples | |||
| Tests performed | Hypotdeses | Sig | Result | ||
| T1a | Comparison of the proportions of respondents using modern (θ1) and post-modern (θ2) theory for absolute risk budgeting | h0: θ1 = θ2 | 0.334 | ||
| T1b | Comparison of the proportions of respondents using modern (θ1) and post-modern (θ2) theory for portfolio optimization with absolute risk | h0: θ1 = θ2 | 0.006 | *** | |
| T1c | Comparison of the proportions of respondents using modern (θ1) and post-Modern (θ2) Theory for performance evaluation | h0: θ1 = θ2 | 0.000 | *** | |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.