Table VIII.

Regression results for the risk-factor approach models

Part 1-Coefficients
ModelConstantBetaSizeBMMomentumLiquidity
(3)0.14159*−0.11223*    
(4)0.14632*−0.13303*−0.09829*0.025361*  
(5)0.14738*−0.11559**−0.10037*0.02553*0.03223* 
(6.1)0.14902*−0.12124*−0.10166*0.02568*0.03264**−0.09694
(6.2)0.01294*−0.83002*−0.06897*0.02671*0.00879**−0.02975**
(6.3)0.13274*−0.06710*−0.05950*0.02820*0.00373*−0.03780*
   Part 2-Tests   
 Adjusted R²F-testWaldLMHausman 
(3)0.02351.21*1.637*12.815*4,49** 
(4)0.062318.05*8.629*52.680*114,73* 
(5)0.063621.08*1.230*57.436*49.62* 
(6.1)0.063711.76*1.113*56.218*46.99* 
(6.2)0.070312.11*1.905*56.610*49.69* 
(6.3)0.072313.19*6.429*57.73*88.37* 

Notes:

Part 1 of the Table shows the regression results for the risk-factor approach models estimated annually through panel data. Standard errors were estimated using a Huber–White robust matrix, considering the results of the tests of regression assumptions, which are in Part 2 of the Table, 1 = Negotiability, 2 = Trading quantity, 3 = Traded volume;

*

significant at 1%;

**

significant at 5%; and *** significant at 10%

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal