Table III. Confirmatory factor analysis... | Emerald Publishing

Table III.

Confirmatory factor analysis of the scale of the cognitive and affective image gap

Causal relationships	Standardised estimators	t	p	Internal consistency^a
NATARTRES ← COGIMGAP	0.958			CR = 0.818 EVA = 0.607 α = 0.699
TOURACTIV ← COGIMGAP	0.614	5.704	0.000
ENVIRON ← COGIMGAP	0.726	6.009	0.000
NAR1 ← NATARTRES	0.536			CR = 0.726 EVA = 0.401 α = 0.723
NAR2 ← NATARTRES	0.672	8.877	0.000
NAR3 ← NATARTRES	0.660	8.803	0.000
NAR4 ← NATARTRES	0.655	8.769	0.000
TOURAC1 ← TOURACTIV	0.604	9.712	0.000	CR = 0.811 EVA = 0.523 α = 0.802
TOURAC2 ← TOURACTIV	0.591
TOURAC3 ← TOURACTIV	0.824	11.774	0.000
TOURAC4 ← TOURACTIV	0.837	11.832	0.000
ENV1 ← ENVIRON	0.728			CR = 0.643 EVA = 0.475 α = 0.641
ENV2 ← ENVIRON	0.648	8.257	0.000	CR = 0.643 EVA = 0.475 α = 0.641
AFFEC1 ← AFFEIMGAP	0.675			CR = 0.697 EVA = 0.537 α = 0.689
AFFEC2 ← AFFEIMGAP	0.786	9.643	0.000	CR = 0.697 EVA = 0.537 α = 0.689

Causal relationships	Standardised estimators	t	p	Internal consistency^a
NATARTRES ← COGIMGAP	0.958			CR = 0.818EVA = 0.607α = 0.699
TOURACTIV ← COGIMGAP	0.614	5.704	0.000
ENVIRON ← COGIMGAP	0.726	6.009	0.000
NAR1 ← NATARTRES	0.536			CR = 0.726EVA = 0.401α = 0.723
NAR2 ← NATARTRES	0.672	8.877	0.000
NAR3 ← NATARTRES	0.660	8.803	0.000
NAR4 ← NATARTRES	0.655	8.769	0.000
TOURAC1 ← TOURACTIV	0.604	9.712	0.000	CR = 0.811EVA = 0.523α = 0.802
TOURAC2 ← TOURACTIV	0.591
TOURAC3 ← TOURACTIV	0.824	11.774	0.000
TOURAC4 ← TOURACTIV	0.837	11.832	0.000
ENV1 ← ENVIRON	0.728			CR = 0.643EVA = 0.475α = 0.641
ENV2 ← ENVIRON	0.648	8.257	0.000	CR = 0.643EVA = 0.475α = 0.641
AFFEC1 ← AFFEIMGAP	0.675			CR = 0.697EVA = 0.537α = 0.689
AFFEC2 ← AFFEIMGAP	0.786	9.643	0.000	CR = 0.697EVA = 0.537α = 0.689

Notes:

^a

CR: composite reliability; AVE: average variance extracted; α: Cronbach’s alfa