Table V. Multi-group comparison...

Table V.

Multi-group comparison

Hypothesis	P_EV	P_W-S	P_H	Confidence intervals
Hypothesis	P_EV	P_W-S	P_H	2.5-97.5%	2.5-97.5 %	Sig.
Intention to use technology: men vs women
In-store tech. → Purchase intention	0.266	0.265	0.133	0.277, 0.506	0.161, 0.438	n.d.
Fitting-room tech. → Purchase intention	0.025	0.025	0.988	0.050, 0.283	0.207, 0.502	n.d.
Own tech.→ Purchase intention	0.211	0.210	0.104	0.240, 0.475	0.120, 0.409	n.d.

Hypothesis	P_EV	P_W-S	P_H	Confidence intervals
Hypothesis	P_EV	P_W-S	P_H	2.5-97.5%	2.5-97.5 %	Sig.
Intention to use technology: men vs women
In-store tech. → Purchase intention	0.266	0.265	0.133	0.277, 0.506	0.161, 0.438	n.d.
Fitting-room tech. → Purchase intention	0.025	0.025	0.988	0.050, 0.283	0.207, 0.502	n.d.
Own tech.→ Purchase intention	0.211	0.210	0.104	0.240, 0.475	0.120, 0.409	n.d.

Notes:

Significance levels based on two-tailed Student’s t-distribution (4.999). P_EV = p-value of the Henseler test; n.d. = no significant differences; SD = significant differences. When there is no overlap in the intervals in the confidence interval test, significant differences are considered to exist (Sarstedt et al., 2011)

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable