Table 1

Summary of measurement systems applied so far for crystals growth diagnosis

Diagnosis method
(reference)
Accuracy,
measurement resolution
Measurement frequencyComments
X-ray tomography
(Bischof et al., 2007; Carlson and Denison, 1992)
high abilities of detection, high resolution60–180 min/image
  • inhomogeneous sensitivity,

  • hard-field radiation safety requirements

Optical tomography
(Abbas et al., 2002)
high resolutionfew frames/ second
  • transparent medium and tank required

Optical Coherence Tomography (Hierzenberger et al., 2010)high resolution of several hundred micronsfew frames/ second
  • partially transparent medium acceptable,

  • transparent tank required

Ultrasound spectroscopy
(Mougin et al., 2003)
high resolution (single crystals detection)few frames/ second
  • invasive for (L) -Glutamic Acid Crystals growth

Electrical Resistance Tomography (Primrose, 2008)low resolution (crystals regions’ detection)up to 100 frames per second for 12 electrodes sensors
  • connection with the process, crystals growth on electrodes,

  • high conductivity medium,

  • possible 3 D imaging

Electrical Capacitance measurement (Al Hosani et al., 2015)
  • low resolution,

  • crystals regions’ detection,

  • for limescale detection

up to 100 frames per second for 12 electrodes sensors
  • no contact with a medium,

  • low medium conductivity recommended,

  • possible 3 D imaging

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options