Table 4

Enabler's path with author's interpretations

S.NoPathAuthorInterpretation
1Path 6-4|moral identity–moral judgmentBlasi (1980) MI facilitates the translation of moral judgments and principles into action
2Path 10-4|job satisfaction–moral judgmentHan Fan et al. (2013) Attitudes positively influence the quality of moral judgments
3Path 6-8|moral identity–empathyLee et al. (2014) Employees with higher moral identity generally feel more empathy for others
4Path 4-8|moral judgment–empathyGleichgerrcht and Young (2013) MJ has an association with empathy
5Path 8-4|empathy–moral judgmentMencl and May, 2009 Empathy has been found more closely related to moral judgment
6Path4-1|moral judgment–seriousness of issueHerzog and Einat (2016) The relationship between moral judgment and perception of seriousness of issue has been found positive
7Path 8-3|empathy–perceived responsibilityOsswald et al. (2011) Empathy has positively connected with attribution of responsibility
8Path 3-1|perceived responsibility– seriousness of issueCrick and Dodge (1994) PR is assumed to be one variable that affects judgments about the seriousness of the issue
9Path 1-3|seriousness of issue–perceived responsibilityVelasquez (1992) Seriousness of wrongdoing is weighted against moral standard, active involvement, heavy cost to reach a level of judgment of responsibility
10Path 3-5|perceived responsibility– moral courageGreitemeyer et al. (2006) PR is important for the decision whether to show moral courage or not
11Path 1-2|seriousness of issue– perceived personal costVelasquez (1992) Seriousness of wrong is weighted against perceived personal cost to reach to a decision
12Path 3-2|perceived responsibility– perceived personal costVelasquez (1992) Seriousness of wrong is weighted against heavy cost to reach a level of judgment of responsibility
13Path 2-5|perceived personal cost–moral courageNiesta Kayser et al. (2010) MC is associated with high personal cost
14Path 5-2|moral courage–perceived personal costAyers and Kaplan (2005) Courageous people do not consider personal cost as intervening factor
15Path 5-7|moral courage–self-efficacyHannah et al. (2011) Moral courage and self-efficacy constructs are distinct yet linked with each other
16Path 7-5|self-efficacy–moral courageOsswald et al. (2011) Self-efficacy acts as promoting factor of moral courage
17Path 7-9|self-efficacy–angerBandura (1996) Efficacy belief has an impact on emotions
18Path 9-7|anger–self-efficacyWright and Mischel (1982) Emotions influence efficacy

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal