Main findings
| Digitalization and publication process | Findings |
|---|---|
| Digital professional services dedicated to academic research |
|
| Academics' awareness of digital services and software |
|
| Impact of digital tools on the scientific publication process |
|
| Scholars' expectations on the future use of digital services and software |
|
| Digitalization and publication process | Findings |
|---|---|
| Digital professional services dedicated to academic research | For the research phase, different digital professional services are offered on the market, such as carrying out surveys independently, obtaining (reliable and tested) datasets, mailing list samples, surveys, and complete statistical analysis from the professionals For the writing phase, services offered enable authors to operate independently with automatic real-time corrections or with the support of professionals to check the manuscript quality For the submission and review phase, professional digital services help the authors submit and re-submit their manuscript according to reviewers' comments Publication services support the authors in marketing the published paper to increase scientific performance indicators |
| Academics' awareness of digital services and software | Academics are aware of multiple online digital services and software for academic research, but they adopt only a limited section Differences exist according to different academic positions and ages Scholars usually adopt the publisher's digital services to submit, copyedit and proofread the manuscript Few scholars invested their time or effort in disseminating research results through social media or digital services or developing relationships with other researchers in the same research area |
| Impact of digital tools on the scientific publication process | For scholars, digital services and software are beneficial in supporting scientific research work and preventing human error Digital tools enable scholars to improve the quality and increase the number of research outputs Online digital services and software have not radically changed scholars' research approach because the reasoning, mental path, research setting, and evaluation of the results have not been modified Younger researchers who recently started working in academia are more familiar with digital services as they learned to use them during their PhDs |
| Scholars' expectations on the future use of digital services and software | Scholars believe that digital services and software would increase in number and use, especially among younger researchers Digital services and software would become more flexible, user-friendly, intuitive, integrated, customizable, have more automated procedures, and be interconnected with other software Digital services and software would increase/improve their functionalities to detect topics relevant to the academic literature and not discussed in other papers, identify similarities or differences in comparison with content already included in other papers, and collect specific topics or theories Some scholars suggest creating a forum grouping scientists to help to collect ideas and prevent research rejection Scholars expect that academic journals and related publishers would improve their offering of digital services Scholars expect efforts to facilitate the payment process for digital services, not to slow down the manuscript writing process Scholars emphasized that in the future, machine learning and all related forms of artificial intelligence may improve the overall quality of the digital services and software |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.