| Chapter 1 | |
| Table 1. | A Review on Suggestions From the Editorials/Notes. |
| Table 2. | Respondent's Characteristics. |
| Table 3. | Exploratory Factor Analysis: Assessment Values. |
| Table 4. | Items Excluded During Factor Analysis. |
| Table 5. | Saatys Nine-Point Scale. |
| Table 6. | AHP Priority Weights and Ranks for POWER Parameters and Their Constituent Decision Elements. |
| Review Paper Template. | |
| Chapter 3 | |
| Table 1. | Name of the Journals Asking for SLR Papers. |
| Table 2. | Systematic versus Traditional Review. |
| Table 3. | Steps for Writing an Effective SLR. |
| Chapter 4 | |
| Table 1. | How Software Tools Facilitate Systematic Review Activities. |
| Table 2. | Software Tools That can Support the Conduct of Bibliometric Literature Reviews. |
| Chapter 5 | |
| Table 1. | Bibliometric Review Studies From Business Management and Social Sciences Discipline. |
| Table 2. | Databases for Bibliometrics. |
| Table 3. | Comparison of the Software. |
| Table 4. | Bibliometric Indicators Suitable for Performance Analysis. |
| Table 5. | List of Journals With Highest Publications of Papers With Bibliometric Analysis. |
| Table 6. | Understanding the Overall Ecosystem of Bibliometric-Based Papers. |
| Chapter 6 | |
| Table 1. | Skillset Required for Literature Review Methodologies. |
| Table 2. | Guidelines for Evaluating the Quality of Literature Review, Adapted From Snyder (2019). |
| Chapter 7 | |
| Table 1. | Strategy to Achieve the Reproducibility Practice in Management Research. |
| Table 2. | PRISMA Extensions Relevant to Review of Management Literature. |
| Chapter 8 | |
| Table 1. | A Comparison of Realist Synthesis With Systematic and Narrative Review Methods. |
| Table 2. | Defining Criteria for “Wicked Problems” and Defining Features of “Complex Problems”. |
| Table 3. | Steps Involved in Planning and Conducting a Realist Synthesis. |
| Table 4. | Sample Findings From a Vote Counting Synthesis of the Characteristics of Included Studies (Following Popay et al. (2006)). |
| Table 5. | Sample Findings From a Vote Counting Synthesis of Evidence (Following Popay et al. (2006)). |
| Table 1. | A Review on Suggestions From the Editorials/Notes. |
| Table 2. | Respondent's Characteristics. |
| Table 3. | Exploratory Factor Analysis: Assessment Values. |
| Table 4. | Items Excluded During Factor Analysis. |
| Table 5. | Saatys Nine-Point Scale. |
| Table 6. | AHP Priority Weights and Ranks for POWER Parameters and Their Constituent Decision Elements. |
| Review Paper Template. | |
| Table 1. | Name of the Journals Asking for SLR Papers. |
| Table 2. | Systematic versus Traditional Review. |
| Table 3. | Steps for Writing an Effective SLR. |
| Table 1. | How Software Tools Facilitate Systematic Review Activities. |
| Table 2. | Software Tools That can Support the Conduct of Bibliometric Literature Reviews. |
| Table 1. | Bibliometric Review Studies From Business Management and Social Sciences Discipline. |
| Table 2. | Databases for Bibliometrics. |
| Table 3. | Comparison of the Software. |
| Table 4. | Bibliometric Indicators Suitable for Performance Analysis. |
| Table 5. | List of Journals With Highest Publications of Papers With Bibliometric Analysis. |
| Table 6. | Understanding the Overall Ecosystem of Bibliometric-Based Papers. |
| Table 1. | Skillset Required for Literature Review Methodologies. |
| Table 2. | Guidelines for Evaluating the Quality of Literature Review, Adapted From Snyder (2019). |
| Table 1. | Strategy to Achieve the Reproducibility Practice in Management Research. |
| Table 2. | PRISMA Extensions Relevant to Review of Management Literature. |
| Table 1. | A Comparison of Realist Synthesis With Systematic and Narrative Review Methods. |
| Table 2. | Defining Criteria for “Wicked Problems” and Defining Features of “Complex Problems”. |
| Table 3. | Steps Involved in Planning and Conducting a Realist Synthesis. |
| Table 4. | Sample Findings From a Vote Counting Synthesis of the Characteristics of Included Studies (Following Popay et al. (2006)). |
| Table 5. | Sample Findings From a Vote Counting Synthesis of Evidence (Following Popay et al. (2006)). |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.