| Figure 1. | Different Combinations of Form and Content Dimensions of Style Configure Coherent and Incoherent Style Typologies |
| Figure 2. | Outline of the Computer-assisted Routine Used to Manipulate Photographic Material |
| Figure 3. | Map of Electronic Music Sub-genres, with Values Assigned to the Main Sub-genres in the Sample |
| Figure 4. | Distribution of Relevant Measures and Style Typologies in the Sample |
| Figure 5. | Decile-wise Ranking Distribution of Each Style Typology (Percentages Represent within-group Proportions) |
| Figure 1. | Hypothesized Impact of Aesthetic and Technological Code Complexity on Lay and Professional Evaluation |
| Figure 1. | US Search Rates for ‘Heels’, ‘Pumps’, ‘Slides’ and ‘Sneakers’ (2008–2018; Google shopping searches) |
| Figure 2. | US Search Rates for ‘Heels’ and ‘Fashion Show’ (2008–2018; Google Web Searches) |
| Figure 3. | Shoes Used (Sample), Studies 1 and 3 |
| Figure 4. | Perceived Power and Perceived Status as a Function of Shoe Style, Study 1 |
| Figure 5. | Choice Set, Study 2 |
| Figure 6. | Action Orientation Score as a Function of Shoe Style and Social Visibility, Study 3 |
| Figure 7. | Abstraction Score as a Function of Shoe Style and Social Visibility, Study 3 |
| Figure 1. | Social Network Structure of the Group |
| Figure 2. | Semantic Content Shared with Integrator |
| Figure 3. | Semantic Content Shared with Critic and Integrator. Link width scaled according to frequency of association;complexity of the component reduced in the mainpicture, full component displayed in the lower right |
| Figure 1. | Topics Distribution and Narrative Conventionality: An Illustration of Two Cases |
| Figure 2. | Narrative Conventionality – Craft Items Sold Relationship. Marginal Effects Estimated by Keeping the Other Covariates at Their Means |
| Figure 1. | Predicted Probabilities of Consumer Evaluations for Movies During Opening Week of Release |
| Figure 2. | Predicted Probabilities of Consumer Evaluations for Movies after Opening Week of Release |
| Figure 1. | Imperfect Imitation in the Semi-periphery |
| Table 1. | Overview of the Regression Models Used to Test the Hypotheses (Method, Dependent Variable and Main Regressors) |
| Table 2. | Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation Matrix (N = 100) |
| Table 3. | Odds of Being Visually Garish |
| Table 4. | Influence of Style Typologies on the Likelihood (Model 6 and 7) and Progressive Odds (Model 8) of Occupying a Higher Position in the Ranking |
| Table 5. | Quantile Regression Predicting the Likelihood of Occupying a Higher Position in the Ranking |
| Table 1. | Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation Coefficients |
| Table 2. | Multilevel Mixed-Effects Logistic Regression on Public Awards (Evaluation by Laypersons) |
| Table 3. | Multilevel Mixed-Effects Logistic Regression on Professional Awards (Evaluation by Professionals) |
| Table 1. | Individual Intensity of Communication |
| Table 2. | Contribution to Semantic Content |
| Table 3. | Properties of Semantic Content with and without Contribution by One of the Leaders |
| Table 4. | Properties of Semantic Content with Two Leaders and without Leaders |
| Table 1. | Two Examples of Narrative-topics Distribution |
| Table 2. | Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix |
| Table 3. | Negative Binomial Regression Models |
| Table 1. | Fashion Houses in Paris and Milan (Sponsoring at Least Five Catwalks from 1999 to 2007) |
| Table 2. | Summary Statistics of Independent Variables |
| Table 3. | Elements of the Style Genome: Continuous Variable Coding (By Garment Type) |
| Table 4. | Elements of the Style Genome: Discrete Variable Coding (For All Garments) |
| Table 5. | Average Style Distance as a Function of Year Span |
| Table 6. | Logistic Regression of Review Meanrating on Designer's (or Design Team) Change (N = 525) |
| Table 7. | Within Designer Regression of Review Meanrating on Individual Designer's Style Distance between Two Seasons |
| Table 8. | Across Designers Regression of Other Designers' Reviews on Individual Designer's Style Distance between Two Seasons |
| Table 1. | Movie Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix for Selected Variables |
| Table 2. | Consumer Evaluations for Movies During Opening Week of Release |
| Table 3. | Consumer Evaluations for Movies During Opening Week of Release |
| Table 4. | Count of Consumer Evaluations for Movies |
| Table 5. | Consumer Evaluation for Movies During Opening Week of Release with Demand Residual |
| Table 6. | Consumer Evaluation for Movies after Opening Week of Release with Demand Residual |
| Table 1. | Sources and Signals of Legitimacy |
| Table 2. | Research Participants |
| Figure 1. | Different Combinations of Form and Content Dimensions of Style Configure Coherent and Incoherent Style Typologies |
| Figure 2. | Outline of the Computer-assisted Routine Used to Manipulate Photographic Material |
| Figure 3. | Map of Electronic Music Sub-genres, with Values Assigned to the Main Sub-genres in the Sample |
| Figure 4. | Distribution of Relevant Measures and Style Typologies in the Sample |
| Figure 5. | Decile-wise Ranking Distribution of Each Style Typology (Percentages Represent within-group Proportions) |
| Figure 1. | Hypothesized Impact of Aesthetic and Technological Code Complexity on Lay and Professional Evaluation |
| Figure 1. | US Search Rates for ‘Heels’, ‘Pumps’, ‘Slides’ and ‘Sneakers’ (2008–2018; Google shopping searches) |
| Figure 2. | US Search Rates for ‘Heels’ and ‘Fashion Show’ (2008–2018; Google Web Searches) |
| Figure 3. | Shoes Used (Sample), Studies 1 and 3 |
| Figure 4. | Perceived Power and Perceived Status as a Function of Shoe Style, Study 1 |
| Figure 5. | Choice Set, Study 2 |
| Figure 6. | Action Orientation Score as a Function of Shoe Style and Social Visibility, Study 3 |
| Figure 7. | Abstraction Score as a Function of Shoe Style and Social Visibility, Study 3 |
| Figure 1. | Social Network Structure of the Group |
| Figure 2. | Semantic Content Shared with Integrator |
| Figure 3. | Semantic Content Shared with Critic and Integrator. Link width scaled according to frequency of association;complexity of the component reduced in the mainpicture, full component displayed in the lower right |
| Figure 1. | Topics Distribution and Narrative Conventionality: An Illustration of Two Cases |
| Figure 2. | Narrative Conventionality – Craft Items Sold Relationship. Marginal Effects Estimated by Keeping the Other Covariates at Their Means |
| Figure 1. | Predicted Probabilities of Consumer Evaluations for Movies During Opening Week of Release |
| Figure 2. | Predicted Probabilities of Consumer Evaluations for Movies after Opening Week of Release |
| Figure 1. | Imperfect Imitation in the Semi-periphery |
| Table 1. | Overview of the Regression Models Used to Test the Hypotheses (Method, Dependent Variable and Main Regressors) |
| Table 2. | Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation Matrix ( |
| Table 3. | Odds of Being Visually Garish |
| Table 4. | Influence of Style Typologies on the Likelihood (Model 6 and 7) and Progressive Odds (Model 8) of Occupying a Higher Position in the Ranking |
| Table 5. | Quantile Regression Predicting the Likelihood of Occupying a Higher Position in the Ranking |
| Table 1. | Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation Coefficients |
| Table 2. | Multilevel Mixed-Effects Logistic Regression on |
| Table 3. | Multilevel Mixed-Effects Logistic Regression on |
| Table 1. | Individual Intensity of Communication |
| Table 2. | Contribution to Semantic Content |
| Table 3. | Properties of Semantic Content with and without Contribution by One of the Leaders |
| Table 4. | Properties of Semantic Content with Two Leaders and without Leaders |
| Table 1. | Two Examples of Narrative-topics Distribution |
| Table 2. | Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix |
| Table 3. | Negative Binomial Regression Models |
| Table 1. | Fashion Houses in Paris and Milan (Sponsoring at Least Five Catwalks from 1999 to 2007) |
| Table 2. | Summary Statistics of Independent Variables |
| Table 3. | Elements of the |
| Table 4. | Elements of the |
| Table 5. | Average Style Distance as a Function of Year Span |
| Table 6. | Logistic Regression of Review Meanrating on Designer's (or Design Team) Change ( |
| Table 7. | Within Designer Regression of Review Meanrating on Individual Designer's Style Distance between Two Seasons |
| Table 8. | Across Designers Regression of Other Designers' Reviews on Individual Designer's Style Distance between Two Seasons |
| Table 1. | Movie Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Matrix for Selected Variables |
| Table 2. | Consumer Evaluations for Movies During Opening Week of Release |
| Table 3. | Consumer Evaluations for Movies During Opening Week of Release |
| Table 4. | Count of Consumer Evaluations for Movies |
| Table 5. | Consumer Evaluation for Movies During Opening Week of Release with Demand Residual |
| Table 6. | Consumer Evaluation for Movies after Opening Week of Release with Demand Residual |
| Table 1. | Sources and Signals of Legitimacy |
| Table 2. | Research Participants |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.