| Fig. 1.1. | Annual Scientific Production | 7 |
| Fig. 1.2. | Average Citation Per Year | 7 |
| Fig. 1.3. | Number of Blue-collar Studies of the Most Relevant Authors | 8 |
| Fig. 1.4. | Publication Performance of the Authors | 8 |
| Fig. 1.5. | Top 10 Most Common Sources | 9 |
| Fig. 1.6. | Abstract Wordcloud (Top 100) | 10 |
| Fig. 1.7. | Authors Keywords Co-occurrence Analysis | 11 |
| Fig. 1.8. | Authors’ Keywords Dendrogram | 12 |
| Fig. 1.9. | Factorial Map for Author's Keywords with Multiple Correspondence Analysis | 13 |
| Fig. 1.10. | Most Global Cited Authors and Years of Their Studies (Top 25) | 13 |
| Fig. 1.11. | Total Citations | 14 |
| Fig. 1.12. | Bibliography Publication Year Spectroscopy | 14 |
| Fig. 1.13. | Co-citation Analysis | 15 |
| Fig. 1.14. | Affiliation Production Over Time | 16 |
| Fig. 1.15. | Collaboration Network by Countries | 17 |
| Fig. 2.1. | Hypothesized Model | 21 |
| Fig. 2.2. | Hypothesized Model and Path Analysis Results | 26 |
| Fig. 4.1. | Research Model | 52 |
| Fig. 4.2. | The Findings Obtained as a Result of the Analyses | 61 |
| Fig. 6.1. | Topics with the Most Representative Words | 93 |
| Fig. 6.2. | Topic–Time Trend | 95 |
| Fig. 6.3. | Inter-topic Distance Map | 96 |
| Fig. 6.4. | Sentiment–Time Trend | 97 |
| Fig. 8.1. | Indegree Centrality Diagram | 133 |
| Fig. 9.1. | Coding Scheme | 146 |
| Fig. 17.1. | Comparison Results | 258 |
| Fig. 17.2. | Coding of Four Approaches | 259 |
| Fig. 17.3. | Comparison of Three Figures | 260 |
| Table 1.1. | Descriptive Information | 6 |
| Table 1.2. | Top 10 Most Cited Studies | 9 |
| Table 1.3. | Top 10 Author Keywords and Keyword Plus | 10 |
| Table 1.4. | Co-occurrence Analysis Network Parameters for Author Keywords with Top Three Betweenness Results for Each Cluster | 12 |
| Table 1.5. | Co-citation Analysis Betweenness Centrality and Closeness Centrality Scores | 15 |
| Table 2.1. | Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations | 27 |
| Table 3.1. | Descriptive Statistics | 37 |
| Table 3.2. | Rotated Component Matrix | 39 |
| Table 3.3. | Mann Whitney-U Test Analyse Results | 39 |
| Table 4.1. | Validity and Reliability Results of the Scale (Smart PLS) | 55 |
| Table 4.2. | Job Passion Scale Validity Results (IBM SPSS AMOS) | 57 |
| Table 4.3. | Correlations Between Variables, Decomposition, and Criterion Validity | 58 |
| Table 4.4. | Research Model Coefficients | 58 |
| Table 4.5. | The Mediation Effect of Job Crafting | 60 |
| Table 6.1. | Cross-tabulation for Topic and Current Employee | 94 |
| Table 6.2. | Chi-square Tests | 94 |
| Table 6.3. | Average Probabilities of Topics | 95 |
| Table 6.4. | Correlations Among Probabilities of Topics | 95 |
| Table 6.5. | Test of Normality for Compound Values within Each Topic Category | 97 |
| Table 6.6. | Kruskal–Wallis H Test for Compound Values | 98 |
| Table 6.7. | Average Compound Values for Each Topic Category | 98 |
| Table 6.8. | Chi-square Test for Topic–Sentiment Association | 98 |
| Table 6.9. | Post-hoc Test for Chi-square Test for Topic–Sentiment Association | 98 |
| Table 7.1. | Research Framework for GCW in I4.0 | 115 |
| Table 8.1. | Social Network Metrics Criteria Used for Actors | 131 |
| Table 8.2. | Centrality Scores | 132 |
| Table 8.3. | Flow Betweenness, Closeness and Honest Brokerage Scores | 132 |
| Table 8.4. | Honest Brokerage Scores | 132 |
| Table 8.5. | Correlation Scores Between Variables | 133 |
| Table 8.6. | Regression Analysis | 134 |
| Table 9.1. | Data Collection Processes | 145 |
| Table 9.2. | Empirical Framework: Social Inclusion and Disabled Gray-collar Workers | 152 |
| Table 11.1. | Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables (N = 391) | 174 |
| Table 11.2. | Negative Binomial Regression Results | 175 |
| Table 12.1. | Descriptive Statistics – Dependent, Independent, and Control Variables | 189 |
| Table 12.2. | Results of Poisson Log-linear Regression Model on the Relationship of Nursing Staff Turnover with HRM Practices and Organizational Culture | 190 |
| Fig. 1.1. | Annual Scientific Production | 7 |
| Fig. 1.2. | Average Citation Per Year | 7 |
| Fig. 1.3. | Number of Blue-collar Studies of the Most Relevant Authors | 8 |
| Fig. 1.4. | Publication Performance of the Authors | 8 |
| Fig. 1.5. | Top 10 Most Common Sources | 9 |
| Fig. 1.6. | Abstract Wordcloud (Top 100) | 10 |
| Fig. 1.7. | Authors Keywords Co-occurrence Analysis | 11 |
| Fig. 1.8. | Authors’ Keywords Dendrogram | 12 |
| Fig. 1.9. | Factorial Map for Author's Keywords with Multiple Correspondence Analysis | 13 |
| Fig. 1.10. | Most Global Cited Authors and Years of Their Studies (Top 25) | 13 |
| Fig. 1.11. | Total Citations | 14 |
| Fig. 1.12. | Bibliography Publication Year Spectroscopy | 14 |
| Fig. 1.13. | Co-citation Analysis | 15 |
| Fig. 1.14. | Affiliation Production Over Time | 16 |
| Fig. 1.15. | Collaboration Network by Countries | 17 |
| Fig. 2.1. | Hypothesized Model | 21 |
| Fig. 2.2. | Hypothesized Model and Path Analysis Results | 26 |
| Fig. 4.1. | Research Model | 52 |
| Fig. 4.2. | The Findings Obtained as a Result of the Analyses | 61 |
| Fig. 6.1. | Topics with the Most Representative Words | 93 |
| Fig. 6.2. | Topic–Time Trend | 95 |
| Fig. 6.3. | Inter-topic Distance Map | 96 |
| Fig. 6.4. | Sentiment–Time Trend | 97 |
| Fig. 8.1. | Indegree Centrality Diagram | 133 |
| Fig. 9.1. | Coding Scheme | 146 |
| Fig. 17.1. | Comparison Results | 258 |
| Fig. 17.2. | Coding of Four Approaches | 259 |
| Fig. 17.3. | Comparison of Three Figures | 260 |
| Table 1.1. | Descriptive Information | 6 |
| Table 1.2. | Top 10 Most Cited Studies | 9 |
| Table 1.3. | Top 10 Author Keywords and Keyword Plus | 10 |
| Table 1.4. | Co-occurrence Analysis Network Parameters for Author Keywords with Top Three Betweenness Results for Each Cluster | 12 |
| Table 1.5. | Co-citation Analysis Betweenness Centrality and Closeness Centrality Scores | 15 |
| Table 2.1. | Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations | 27 |
| Table 3.1. | Descriptive Statistics | 37 |
| Table 3.2. | Rotated Component Matrix | 39 |
| Table 3.3. | Mann Whitney-U Test Analyse Results | 39 |
| Table 4.1. | Validity and Reliability Results of the Scale (Smart PLS) | 55 |
| Table 4.2. | Job Passion Scale Validity Results (IBM SPSS AMOS) | 57 |
| Table 4.3. | Correlations Between Variables, Decomposition, and Criterion Validity | 58 |
| Table 4.4. | Research Model Coefficients | 58 |
| Table 4.5. | The Mediation Effect of Job Crafting | 60 |
| Table 6.1. | Cross-tabulation for Topic and Current Employee | 94 |
| Table 6.2. | Chi-square Tests | 94 |
| Table 6.3. | Average Probabilities of Topics | 95 |
| Table 6.4. | Correlations Among Probabilities of Topics | 95 |
| Table 6.5. | Test of Normality for Compound Values within Each Topic Category | 97 |
| Table 6.6. | Kruskal–Wallis | 98 |
| Table 6.7. | Average Compound Values for Each Topic Category | 98 |
| Table 6.8. | Chi-square Test for Topic–Sentiment Association | 98 |
| Table 6.9. | Post-hoc Test for Chi-square Test for Topic–Sentiment Association | 98 |
| Table 7.1. | Research Framework for GCW in I4.0 | 115 |
| Table 8.1. | Social Network Metrics Criteria Used for Actors | 131 |
| Table 8.2. | Centrality Scores | 132 |
| Table 8.3. | Flow Betweenness, Closeness and Honest Brokerage Scores | 132 |
| Table 8.4. | Honest Brokerage Scores | 132 |
| Table 8.5. | Correlation Scores Between Variables | 133 |
| Table 8.6. | Regression Analysis | 134 |
| Table 9.1. | Data Collection Processes | 145 |
| Table 9.2. | Empirical Framework: Social Inclusion and Disabled Gray-collar Workers | 152 |
| Table 11.1. | Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables ( | 174 |
| Table 11.2. | Negative Binomial Regression Results | 175 |
| Table 12.1. | Descriptive Statistics – Dependent, Independent, and Control Variables | 189 |
| Table 12.2. | Results of Poisson Log-linear Regression Model on the Relationship of Nursing Staff Turnover with HRM Practices and Organizational Culture | 190 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.