Fig. 0.1Author Group Photo, EARMA Conference, 25th April 2023, Prague, Czechia.4
Fig. 0.2Author Group Photo, INORMS Conference, 31st May 2023, Durban, South Africa.5
Fig. 1.3.1.Experience Years as RMAs in Asia.40
Fig. 1.3.2.Employment Type of RMAs in Asia.41
Fig. 1.3.3.Age Range of RMAs in Asia.42
Fig. 1.5.1.Countries of Central and Eastern Europe Based on the Working Definition.56
Fig. 1.5.2.Amount of Net EU Contribution Absorbed by CEE Countries and EU-14 Countries in the Last Two FPs60
Fig. 1.5.3.Number of Participations from CEE and EU-14 in EU-Funded Projects During the Last Two FPs62
Fig. 1.7.1.The Founding Members of INORMS, 2001.86
Fig. 2.1.1.Data Structure.107
Fig. 2.2.1.Geographic Coverage of Responses.115
Fig. 2.2.2.Gender Identity by Region.115
Fig. 2.2.3.Age of RMAs When Joining the Profession by Region.116
Fig. 2.2.4.Age of RMAs in the Profession by Region.117
Fig. 2.2.5.The (Self-Reported) Role Level of RMAs by Region.118
Fig. 2.2.6.RMA Institution Type by Region.118
Fig. 2.2.7.Areas that RMAs Work in (Japanese Taxonomy) by Region.119
Fig. 2.2.8.Proportion of RMAs, by Region, Born in Different Country From Where They Now Work.119
Fig. 2.2.9.Number of RMA Associations Affiliations by Region.120
Fig. 2.2.10.Highest Academic Qualifications of RMAs, by Region.121
Fig. 2.2.11.Professional Accreditation of RMAs by Regions.121
Fig. 2.3.1.Routes into RMA by Region.127
Fig. 2.3.2.Factors to Become an RMA by the Scale of Relevance.128
Fig. 2.3.3.RMA Career Satisfaction by Region.136
Fig. 2.5.1.Institution Type by RAAAP Survey Iteration.158
Fig. 2.5.2.Selected Characteristics of RMAs and Their Relation With Task Types and Working Settings.159
Fig. 2.6.1.Research Project Management – Finished 2010–2022.173
Fig. 2.8.1.The Informal Level: Understanding the Environment.189
Fig. 2.8.2.Push and Pull Factors in RMA.194
Fig. 3.1.1.Most Important Skills to Fulfil the RMA Job, by the RMA Respondents (n = 90).209
Fig. 3.1.2.Most Important Competencies to Fulfil the RMA Job, by the RMA Respondents (n = 90).210
Fig. 3.1.3.Most Important Skills to Fulfil the RMA Job, by the Students.214
Fig. 3.1.4.Most Important Skills to Fulfil the RMA Job, by the Teachers.215
Fig. 3.1.5.Most Important Competencies to Fulfil the RMA Job, by the Students.216
Fig. 3.1.6.Most Important Competencies to Fulfil the RMA Job, by the Teachers.217
Fig. 3.2.1.Level of Effort of Sources of Explicit Knowledge × Phase of the Research Project Life Cycle.227
Fig. 3.2.2.Country Institutionalisation and Professional Maturity Level in RMA. 228
Fig. 3.4.1.Example of a Ribbon Chart Extracted from Microsoft BI – Master’s Degrees Awarded by Faculty and Gender at Stellenbosch University (2021 Data).258
Fig. 3.4.2.Example of an Infographic for Internal Reporting/Showcasing – Research Successes at Stellenbosch University (2022 Data).259
Fig. 3.5.1.Arguments in This Chapter.267
Fig. 3.5.2.Responses to ‘Which Best Describes Your Current Positions?’270
Fig. 3.5.3.Responses to ‘How Much Knowledge And Skills Do You Think You Have Now?’271
Fig. 3.5.4.Visualisation of STI Coordinating Roles.272
Photo 1.(left): Dr Taro Sonobe, Representing a Chef to Mix Different Spices for a Project.278
Photo 2.(right): Group Discussion.278
Fig. 3.6.1.The Position of the Survey Respondents (n = 115).287
Fig. 3.6.2.Number of Years Spent as RMA (n = 115).287
Fig. 3.6.3.Influence of RMA Associations on the Identity and Interests of Members (n = 115).289
Fig. 3.6.4.Increasing Rate of Active Promotion of RMA in Line with the Length of the Membership in International RMA Associations (n = 78).290
Fig. 3.6.5.Influence of RMA Associations on Policy-Making (n = 115).292
Fig. 4.1.1.Professional Development Escalator for RMA in Africa (Authors).320
Fig. 4.2.1.Institutional Background of the Respondents and the Geographical Location of Their Institute According to NUTS-2 Regions.327
Fig. 4.2.2.Institutional Settings Related to Data Management and Open Access.332
Fig. 4.2.3.Institutional Practices and Procedures Related to Research Ethics.334
Fig. 4.5.1.Prevalence of Work-Related Stress.375
Fig. 4.5.2.RMA Job Demands Are Increasing.376
Fig. 4.5.3.High Stress Anxiety from Competing Demands of Work and Home.377
Fig. 4.5.4.Frequency of Self-neglect Evidenced Through Working While Sick.379
Fig. 4.7.1.Conceptual Model.400
Fig. 5.2.1.Organisational Chart for the Directorate of Research, Innovation and Technology (DRIT) at SEKU.430
Fig. 5.8.1.BRAMA – Current Reality of the Active Individual Members.489
Fig. 5.9.1.Evolution of the Colombian Investment for Science, Technology and Innovation Activities (2000–2020). Million Colombian Pesos.495
Fig. 5.9.2.Distribution of Colombian Resources for Science, Technology and Innovation Activities (2000–2020).495
Fig. 5.9.3.RMAs Age Range Profile in: Columbia and the World.498
Fig. 5.9.4.Distribution of the Experience as RMAs in Columbia and the World (Number of Years).498
Fig. 5.9.5.Distribution of the RMAs Identity in Colombia and the World.500
Fig. 5.11.1.Demographics of Members of the IRMI Network (Data Courtesy India Alliance).515
Fig. 5.11.2.Expansion of the IRMI Network (Data Courtesy India Alliance).516
Fig. 5.12.1.Theoretical Framework of the URA’s Role in Research Dynamics.521
Fig. 5.12.2.Japanese URA Employees in FY 2022.522
Fig. 5.12.3.The Main Role of URAs Is Different Depending on the University Size.522
Fig. 5.13.1.The Malaysia GERD by Sector as % of GDP from 1996 to 2016 (Science, Technology and innovation: Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD), GERD Per Capita and GERD Per Researcher, 2020).528
Fig. 5.13.2.Non-Academic Schemes Warranted to Universities, Areas in Research Management That Can Be Filled by Staff from the Different Schemes, and Map of the Research Management Functions at Different Institutions with Dedicated Staffs.530
Fig. 5.15.1.Timeline of the Evolution of Research Management and Support Structures at NTU.545
Fig. 5.15.2.Network Collaboration Map at the College-Level for ACE Award Grantees for a Five-Year Period.546
Fig. 5.16.1.RMA Levels in Vietnam.553
Fig. 5.16.2.Expenditures on S&T Activities from the State Budget from 2015 Through 2020.554
Fig. 5.16.3.Vietnam’s R&D Expenditures by Funding Sources in the Three Years of 2015, 2017, and 2019 (Billion VND).555
Fig. 5.16.4.R&D Human Resources by Implementation Area (Person).555
Fig. 5.17.1.2022 Survey of RMAs in Australia by Period of Employment in the Profession.561
Fig. 5.17.2.2019 Survey of RMAs in Australia by Key Reasons for Becoming an RMA.561
Fig. 5.17.3.2019 Survey of RMAs in Australia by Key Reasons for Staying in the Profession.562
Fig. 5.17.4.2022 Survey of RMAs in Australia by Role.563
Fig. 5.18.1.Changes in NZ & Pacific Chapter Membership in ARMS, 2015–2021.570
Fig. 5.18.2.Size of NZ R&D Workforce by Sector and Occupation.571
Fig. 5.18.3.Ethnicity of RS in TEO in NZ, 2019–2021.573
Fig. 5.18.4.Age Distribution of RS in TEO in NZ, 2019–2021.573
Fig. 5.18.5.Gender of RS in TEO in NZ, 2019–2021.574
Fig. 5.21.1.R&D Personnel by Field of Science in Cyprus 1998–2019.596
Fig. 5.21.2.Structure of the Cypriot R&I Governance System.597
Fig. 5.21.3.Gender Identification and Age Ranges of When First Becoming an RMA and Currently in Cyprus.600
Fig. 5.21.4.Reason for Becoming an RMA, Years Employed as an RMA, and RMA Jobs During Those Years in Cyprus.600
Fig. 5.21.5.Type and Nature of Institutions Where RMAs Are Employed in Cyprus.601
Fig. 5.21.6.Educational Attainment Level and Academic Background in Cyprus: Before Becoming an RMA and During Employment as RMA.601
Fig. 5.21.7.Professional Development Classes Taken by RMAs in Cyprus.602
Fig. 5.22.1.Total RDI Spending by Selected Public Funding Providers Between 2013 and 2022 in Czechia.607
Fig. 5.23.1.Overview of the Polish Institutions in the Field of Science.615
Fig. 5.25.1.R&D Investments in Slovenia (in % of GDP).635
Fig. 5.30.1.Funds from the Horizon 2020 (8th FP) Managed by RPOs and HEIs.672
Fig. 5.32.1.A picture of the RLO Staff in 1997 (University of Iceland Research Liaison Office et al., 1998).690
Fig. 5.34.1.R&D Expenditure in Italy by Source of Funds.709
Fig. 5.34.2.Activities by RMA Professional Role in Italy.712
Fig. 5.36.1.The Norwegian System of Education, Research and Innovation (RCN, 2022).724
Fig. 5.37.1.Years of Experience and Background of the RMA Survey Respondents in Portugal.739
Fig. 5.40.1.Simplified UK Research Funding Ecosystem.761
Fig. 5.40.2.UK RMA Gender Identity by Role Level.765
Fig. 5.40.3.UK RMA Academic Attainment by Role Level.765
Fig. 5.41.1.Structure of the Research and Innovation system in Qatar.774
Fig. 5.43.1.Simplified R&D Ecosystem of UAE, in 2023.792

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal