The new indications, theoretical background and implementation methods
| New indicator | Theoretical background | Implementation phase | Suggestion for implementation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Value: Health | ||||
| Non-work related activities | (Beslin & Reddin, 2004), (Wong & Cheung, 2004) | Construction | The client has to arrange the activities continuously during the construction phase. These social activities can be everything from a football tournament to a morning breakfast | |
| Core Value: Functionality | ||||
| Screening of constructability | (Ballard, 2000) | Before tender | The client must invest in an external screening of the constructability of the existing building | |
| Follow up meetings | (Ballard, 2000) | Pre-project, design and construction | The client has to ensure that follow-up meetings are on the time schedule and master plan updates are performed continuously during the construction | |
| Core Value: Communication | ||||
| Common site meetings every week for problem solving | (Ballard, 2000) | Construction | A weekly common site meeting for all workers on site to discuss smaller and simpler issues for solving | |
| Feedback from residents, elimination of issues and a report for future improvements | (Brunsgaard, 2011), (Ballard, 2000) | Operation | A meeting with the residents two months after moving in to ensure correct use of the installation. Feedback summary sent to the contractors and designers for future improvements | |
| Intermediation of design choices with visuals | (Al-Kodmany, 1999) | Pre-design, design and construction | Visuals used by the designers as means to showcase and communicate design choices through either BIM models, virtual reality, mock-ups, etc. | |
| Common cantina | (Christensen & Parbst, 2009) | Construction | The common cantina must be on-site and in a fair distance to reach for the workers around site. The eating area must be able to accommodate all the workers on-site at all times | |
| Open digital quality assurance from all partners of the construction | (Gambetta, 1988), (Wong & Cheung, 2004) | Design and construction (requirement in the tender) | The quality assurance should be stored online for all involved parties to access during the construction phase | |
| Core Value: Identity | ||||
| Historic analysis of the area, the building and architectural observations | (Beim, 2012), (Nygaard, 2002), (Bech-Nielsen, 1997) | Pre-design, design | Assessing the architectural value of the building and the area through the SAVE model with a set of analysis measures related to style, area, time, typical expression and building method | |
| Description and quality assurance plan of details either preserved or newly added | (Vibæk Jensen & Beim, 2006), (Nygaard, 2002), (Gehl, 2003) | Pre-design, design, construction | A description of the details in the design split into fine-grained and coarse-grained details together with a plan for the quality assurance | |
| Description of the materials | (Vibæk Jensen & Beim, 2006) | Design | A report describing larger components both inside and outside. The components must be described with aging, details, texture, colour and composition | |
| Interior chosen by the resident | (Vibæk Jensen & Beim, 2006) | Design | The residents choose the interior, within a scheme of choices | |
| Adapt and design small area by residents | (Vibæk Jensen & Beim, 2006) | Design | The residents adapt and design an area in the building or in the connected outdoor area | |
| Transition areas from private to public | (Gehl, et al., 2004), (Gehl, 2003), (Acre & Wyckmans, 2015) | Design | A report with drawings proving how the transition areas are created | |
| Constant activity by design | (Gehl, 2003) | Design | A concept plan including drawings and an explanation of how the design supports activity at the site at all hours | |
| Core Value: Education | ||||
| Use of social clauses in the tender | (Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, 2016) | Before tender | A minimum of 10% of all the hired workforces must be under education | |
| New indicator | Theoretical background | Implementation phase | Suggestion for implementation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Value: Health | ||||
| Non-work related activities | ( | Construction | The client has to arrange the activities continuously during the construction phase. These social activities can be everything from a football tournament to a morning breakfast | |
| Core Value: Functionality | ||||
| Screening of constructability | ( | Before tender | The client must invest in an external screening of the constructability of the existing building | |
| Follow up meetings | ( | Pre-project, design and construction | The client has to ensure that follow-up meetings are on the time schedule and master plan updates are performed continuously during the construction | |
| Core Value: Communication | ||||
| Common site meetings every week for problem solving | ( | Construction | A weekly common site meeting for all workers on site to discuss smaller and simpler issues for solving | |
| Feedback from residents, elimination of issues and a report for future improvements | ( | Operation | A meeting with the residents two months after moving in to ensure correct use of the installation. Feedback summary sent to the contractors and designers for future improvements | |
| Intermediation of design choices with visuals | ( | Pre-design, design and construction | Visuals used by the designers as means to showcase and communicate design choices through either BIM models, virtual reality, mock-ups, etc. | |
| Common cantina | ( | Construction | The common cantina must be on-site and in a fair distance to reach for the workers around site. The eating area must be able to accommodate all the workers on-site at all times | |
| Open digital quality assurance from all partners of the construction | ( | Design and construction (requirement in the tender) | The quality assurance should be stored online for all involved parties to access during the construction phase | |
| Core Value: Identity | ||||
| Historic analysis of the area, the building and architectural observations | ( | Pre-design, design | Assessing the architectural value of the building and the area through the SAVE model with a set of analysis measures related to style, area, time, typical expression and building method | |
| Description and quality assurance plan of details either preserved or newly added | ( | Pre-design, design, construction | A description of the details in the design split into fine-grained and coarse-grained details together with a plan for the quality assurance | |
| Description of the materials | ( | Design | A report describing larger components both inside and outside. The components must be described with aging, details, texture, colour and composition | |
| Interior chosen by the resident | ( | Design | The residents choose the interior, within a scheme of choices | |
| Adapt and design small area by residents | ( | Design | The residents adapt and design an area in the building or in the connected outdoor area | |
| Transition areas from private to public | ( | Design | A report with drawings proving how the transition areas are created | |
| Constant activity by design | (Gehl, 2003) | Design | A concept plan including drawings and an explanation of how the design supports activity at the site at all hours | |
| Core Value: Education | ||||
| Use of social clauses in the tender | ( | Before tender | A minimum of 10% of all the hired workforces must be under education | |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.