Table 1

Summary of indicators used to assess document quality in the construction industry

Indicator of qualityDescriptionReferencesFrequency
AccuracyDocuments that do not contain omissions and errorsTilley et al. (1999), Samson and Parker (1994), Tang et al. (2003), Andi and Minato (2003), Abdul-Aziz and Ali (2004), Aluko et al. (2021) 6
ClarityDocuments that are easy to understand and not ambiguousTilley et al. (1999), Samson and Parker (1994), Tang et al. (2003), Andi and Minato (2003), Chow and Ng (2010), Tan (2012), Kärnä and Junnonen (2017), Aluko et al. (2021) 8
CompletenessDocuments that contain all the necessary information for a contractor to execute the projectTilley et al. (1999), Tang et al. (2003), Andi and Minato (2003), Chow and Ng (2010), Aluko et al. (2021) 5
TimelinessDocuments that are prepared and submitted timeously to relevant partiesTilley et al. (1999), Samson and Parker (1994), Hoxley (2000), Andi and Minato (2003), Abdul-Aziz and Ali (2004), Cheng et al. (2006), Oluwatayo et al. (2014), Lam (2016), Aluko et al. (2021) 9
RelevancyDocuments that contain all the relevant information related to the projectTilley et al. (1999), Andi and Minato (2003) 2
ConsistencyDocuments that are consistent and exhibits relevant co-ordination amongst different disciplinesTilley et al. (1999), Andi and Minato (2003) 2
StandardisationStandardisation of documents in accordance with client requirements. Drawings and specifications standardised to simplify the construction processTilley et al. (1999), Andi and Minato (2003) 2
CertaintyDocuments that are not constantly revised by the professional teamTilley et al. (1999), Andi and Minato (2003) 2
ConformityDocuments that conform with relevant regulations and standardsTilley et al. (1999), Andi and Minato (2003) 2
PresentationDocuments that are neatly compiled and formattedHoxley (2000) 1

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options