Table I

Literature review of the case studies for the pre-positioning and related problems

ArticleTimeLocationDisaster typePrincipal data sourcesMain findingsMethodology
Balcik and Beamon (2008) 1900–2006WorldwideEarthquakeNational Geophysical Data Center, Socioeconomic Data and Applications CenterPre-disaster investments have a strong impact on the emergency strategy response time and proportion of demand satisfiedSensitivity analysis on pre- and post-disaster budgets
Barzinpour and Esmaeili (2014) –TehranEarthquakeRisk Assessment tool for Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disaster, GIS informationVirtual zoning approach (that helps the authorities create a better collaboration between neighboring local areas) yields lower logistics costs and greater coverage that municipal subregional zoningComparison of the solutions obtained by the two different approaches
Bemley et al. (2013) 2005US Gulf CoastHurricaneUS Coast Guard, National Weather Service, National Hurricane CenterPre-positioning of repair supplies increases the ability of a port to quickly recover from disastersSensitivity analysis on the amount of available supply
Bozorgi-Amiri et al. (2013) –TehranEarthquakeTehran Municipality Urban Planning and Research CenterIt is beneficial to consider the total cost and people satisfaction simultaneously rather than individually; the same holds for different types of uncertaintyComparison of the solutions obtained by the proposed bi-objective model and the two single-objective models; and models that consider some or all types of uncertainty
Chapman et al. (2014) –South Eastern USHurricaneLouisiana Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (Chapman, 2007)Pre-positioning emergency supplies reduces both the logistics costs and the unmet demandComparison of the solutions obtained with or without a pre-positioning policy
de Brito Junior et al. (2013) –São Paulo State–Historical data and geographic informationStochastic model generates more robust solutionsComparison of the solutions obtained by a deterministic and stochastic model
Falasca and Zobel (2011) –––Random instanceStochastic programming on average reduces the logistics costs and the unmet demand compared to a simple expected value approachComparison of the solutions obtained by a deterministic and stochastic model
Galindo and Batta (2013) 2005US Gulf CoastHurricaneNational Hurricane Center, Internal Revenue Service e-File, Natural Resources Defense Council (Cornuéjols et al., 1991; Lin et al., 2011)Pre-positioning reduces the logistics costsSensitivity analyses on the amplifying factor that indicates the number of times that the distribution costs are amplified after the disaster
Gonçalves et al. (2013) 2009–2010EthiopiaFood insecurityWorld Food Program EthiopiaThe proposed model is a useful tool for food aid supply and distribution planningComparison of the solution obtained by the proposed model to the strategy carried out by World Food Program
Klibi et al. (2013) 1964–2012North Carolina–North Carolina Emergency Management Division, Federal Emergency Management AgencyThe proposed solution approach is useful for tackling humanitarian relief problemsComparison of the solution obtained by the proposed solution approach with the existing network design
Li et al. (2011) 1880–2007US Gulf CoastHurricaneNorth Atlantic Hurricane Database, State Government of Louisiana, American Red Cross (Klotzbach et al., 2014)The proposed model and solution procedure can be used to efficiently solve the sheltering network planningDemonstration of the solution algorithm convergence and efficiency for a real-world problem instance
Lodree et al. (2012) –US Gulf CoastHurricaneRawls and Turnquist (2010) Expected performance of the proposed pre-positioning strategy is more effective than the wait-and-see approachComparison of the solutions obtained using the two approaches
Manopiniwes et al. (2014) 2011ThailandFloodDepartment of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Ministry of Interior of the Royal Thai GovernmentThe proposed model can be used to optimize the facility locations and stocking decisionsSensitivity analysis on different time and cost parameters
Mete and Zabinsky (2010) –SeattleEarthquakeCascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Washington Military Department Emergency Management DivisionThe proposed model can aid interdisciplinary agencies to both prepare and respond to disastersApplication of the model to solve the case study
Moreno et al. (2016) 2011Rio de Janeiro StateFloodThe Emergency Events Database, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (Altay and Green, 2006; Rawls and Turnquist, 2010)The integration of decisions in a multi-period context and the option of reusing vehicles reduce total costs, thus improving the overall performance of the relief operationsComparison of the solutions obtained by a single- and multi-period model, and with our without reusing the vehicles
Murali et al. (2012) –Los Angeles CountyAnthrax attackBravata et al. (2006) The proposed heuristic can be used to locate facilities to address large-scale emergenciesComparison of the solutions obtained by the proposed locate-allocate heuristic and simulated annealing procedure introduced in (Berman and Drezner, 2006)
Noyan (2012) –US Gulf CoastHurricaneRawls and Turnquist (2010) The optimal location and allocation policies change with respect to the risk parameters that describe the level of conservativeness and risk-aversenessSensitivity analysis on the risk parameters
Pradhananga et al. (2016) –US Gulf CoastHurricaneRawls and Turnquist (2010) The network and deprivation cost structure affects the preparedness and response planning decisions and resulting costs and level of serviceComparison of the solutions obtained by considering a single pre-selected potential supply point and the proposed three-echelon network structure with multiple supply points; and of the solutions obtained by minimizing constant, linearly- and the proposed exponentially-increasing deprivation costs
Rawls and Turnquist (2010) –US Gulf CoastHurricaneThe Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological LaboratoryThe proposed Lagrangian L-shaped heuristic can be used as an effective large-scale resource pre-positioning planning toolComparison of the solutions obtained by the proposed heuristic and CPLEX
Rawls and Turnquist (2011) –US Gulf CoastHurricaneRawls and Turnquist (2010) Adding the service quality constraints to the model results in more open facilities, reduced tendency of facilities to be specialized for storage of just one commodity and increased computational complexityComparison of the solutions obtained with and without service quality constraints
Renkli and Duran (2015) –IstanbulEarthquakeIstanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Japan International Cooperation AgencyAdding a probabilistic constraint that ensures a certain service reliability opens storage facilities at safer but more distant locations from their assigned affected areas, thereby reducing the expected unsatisfied demand and increasing the average distanceComparison of the solutions obtained by employing a model with and without reliability constraints
Rezaei-Malek and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam (2014) –SeattleEarthquakeMete and Zabinsky (2010) It is beneficial to consider the response time and sum of logistics and unmet demand penalty costs simultaneously rather than individuallyComparison of solutions obtained by the proposed bi-objective model and the two single-objective models
Rottkemper et al. (2011) –BurundiMeningitis epidemicMédecins Sans FrontièèresTaking the possibility of future disruptions (e.g. an overlapping disaster) into account can help to balance inventories and decrease unsatisfied demand, without a significant increase in logistics costsComparison of the solutions obtained by the proposed model and the transshipment model when uncertain parts of demand are ignored
Salmerón and Apte (2010) ––HurricaneFritz Institute, Federal Emergency Management Agency (Heidtke, 2007; Tean, 2006)As more budget becomes available, allocation levels increase progressively in warehouses and shelters, and remain fairly constant for expansion of ramp space and health facilities, what is a clear indication that initial conditions in warehouse capacity are the most compelling limitation to minimize casualtiesSensitivity analysis on the total budget
Sheu and Pan (2014) 2009TaiwanTyphoonMinistry of the Interior Department of Statistics, Pingtung County Government, Central Disaster Emergency Operation Center Taiwan, local hospitals, GIS informationA centralized emergency supply network designed by the proposed method is superior over a decentralized one (host government does not collaborate with local NGOs), especially with regard to distribution network designComparison of the solutions obtained by the model under a decentralized and centralized condition
Uichanco 2013PhillipinesTyphoonPhilippines’ Department of Social Welfare and Development, National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, GIS information (Holland, 1980)The proposed robust model yields a lower average distance traveled than other common pre-positioning methods under typhoon path uncertainty and supply vulnerabilityComparison of the solutions obtained with no pre-positioning and the nominal, stochastic and robust pre-positioning strategies

Note: In most of the literature on the pre-positioning problem, the authors process a lot of data from a few databases in order to generate a single case study that they use to obtain their findings

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options