Network

Description Source

Chile 2010 earthquake and tsunami [17]

Turkey 1999 earthquake [9]

Senegal ease study, instance Mboro [75]

US Gulf Coast hurricane threat [62]

Number of vertices

47

14

30

30

Number of facility categories

1

1

1

3

Number of commodity types

4

1

1

3

Number of scenarios

1

9

10

51

Budgets:

Budget for facilities

200,000

150,000

10,000

1,000,000

Acquisition budget

500,000,000

1,000,000

300,000

29,500,000

Transportation budget

50,000,000

2,000

2,000

1,500,000

Facilities:

Category

One category

One category

One category

Small facility

Medium facility

Large facility

Capacity

100,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

-

-

-

12,000

-

-

-

22,000

Opening cost

100,000

35,000

5,000

19,600

-

-

-

188,400

-

-

-

300,000

Commodities:

Type

1 bottle of water or milk

Aid kit

Aid kit

1 000 gallons of water

3 meals

-

-

1 000 meals

1 personal product

-

-

medical kit

1 medicine unit

-

-

-

Unit volume

0.00143

0.1

0.2

4

0.00021

-

-

2.3587

0.00025

-

-

0.03285

0.00005

-

-

-

Unit acquisition cost

0.2

20

30

647.7

2

-

-

5,420

5

-

-

140

3

-

-

-

Unit transportation cost

0.000158571

0.02

0.005

0.3

0.000023786

-

-

0.04

0.00002775

-

-

0.00058

0.00000555

-

-

-

Average speed

30

20

50

45

Summary:

Network description

There are 44 demand vertices in Chile clustered in groups of close- by villages where facilities cannot be opened and 3 zero demand vertices outside Chile as the only potential facility locations

There are 6 demand vertices where facilities cannot be opened, 5 zero demand vertices that arc potential facility locations and 3 zero demand vertices that are not potential facility locations

All vertices arc demand vertices in every scenario and are all potential facility locations. All scenario hap-pen with equal probability p=0.1

All vertices arc potential facility locations, and in each scenario a few of them have non-zero demand.

Expected proportion of aid that remains usable at a potential facility location

1

1

1

0.97414

1

-

-

0.97414

1

-

-

0.97414

1

-

-

-

Demand at a single vertex in a scenario

[0, 19,772,600]

[0, 21,793]

[2, 9,050]

[0, 9, 495]

[0, 19,772,600]

-

-

[0. 5,285]

[0, 4,519,440]

-

-

[0, 37,751.1]

[0, 4,519,440]

-

-

-

Expected demand at a vertex in a scenario

3,181,830

10,995.4

575.933

1,010.12

3,181,830

-

-

286.816

727,275

-

-

2,164.83

727,275

-

-

-

Expected total demand in a scenario

140,000,000

65,972.2

17,278

4,321.76

140,000,000

-

-

2,102.12

32,000,100

-

-

14,537.2

32,000,100

-

-

-

Expected number of demand vertices in a scenario

44

6

30

5.74755

Expected shortest path distance between 2 vertices

505.175

3.50159

33.559

1,114.04

Expected shortest path distance between 2 demand vertices

288.921

3.81812

33.559

515.885

Capacity required to store the expected total demand in a scenario

239,201

6,597.23

3,455.6

22,722.9

Facility budget necessary to meet the expected total demand in a scenario

300,000

105,000

10,000

450,800

Acquisition budget necessary to meet the expected total demand in a scenario

564,002,000

1,319,440

518,340

16,227,900

Additional case studies derived

case-study-47-1-4-6_1

case-study-14-1-1-9 1

case-study-30-1-1-10_1

case-study-30-3-3-51 _1

case-study-47-1-4-6_2

case-study-14-1-1-9 2

case-study-30-1-1-10_2

case-study-30-3-3-51 _2

case-study-47-1-4-6_3

case-study-14-1-1-9 3

case-study-30-1-1-10_3

case-study-30-3-3-51 _3

case-study-47-1-4-6_4

case-study-14-1-1-9_4

case-study-30-1-1-10_4

case-study-30-3-3-51 _4

case-study-47-2-4-1_1

case-study-14- 1-1-9_5

case-study-30-1-1- 10_5

case-study-30-1-3-51

case-study-47-2-4-1_2

case-study-30-1-1-10_6

case-study-47-2-4-6_1

case-study-30-1-1-10_7

case-study-47-2-4-6_2

case-study-30-1-1-10_8