Table 8 Hypothesis test Hypothesis test... | Emerald Publishing

Table 8

Hypothesis test

Hypothesis test	Coeff (β)	Std. Deviation	T Statistics	95% percentile CI	Conclusion
AI→KMPs (H1)	0.4812	0.0736	6.0618***	[0.300; 0.683]	H1 Supported
AI→MF (H2)	0.0063	0.0792	0.0787 n.s	[−0.2509; 0.061]	H2 Rejected
AI→SCR (H3)	0.0222	0.0798	0.2912 n.s	[−0.243; 0.053]	H3 Rejected
KMPs→MFP (H4)	0.5105	0.1217	3.6411***	[0.461; 0.930]	H4 Supported
KMPs→SCR (H5)	0.6278	0.0817	8.1041***	[0.598; 0.9016]	H5 Supported
SCR→MFP (H6)	0.1343	0.1271	1.0566 n.s	[−0.268; 0.238]	H6 Rejected
Size→AI	0.2625	0.0987	2.6334**	[0.058; 0.455]	Significant effect
Age→AI	−0.0404	0.0460	−0.8857 n.s	[−0.147; 0.029]	Non-significant effect

Hypothesis test	Coeff (β)	Std. Deviation	T Statistics	95% percentile CI	Conclusion
AI→KMPs (H1)	0.4812	0.0736	6.0618***	[0.300; 0.683]	H1 Supported
AI→MF (H2)	0.0063	0.0792	0.0787 n.s	[−0.2509; 0.061]	H2 Rejected
AI→SCR (H3)	0.0222	0.0798	0.2912 n.s	[−0.243; 0.053]	H3 Rejected
KMPs→MFP (H4)	0.5105	0.1217	3.6411***	[0.461; 0.930]	H4 Supported
KMPs→SCR (H5)	0.6278	0.0817	8.1041***	[0.598; 0.9016]	H5 Supported
SCR→MFP (H6)	0.1343	0.1271	1.0566 n.s	[−0.268; 0.238]	H6 Rejected
Size→AI	0.2625	0.0987	2.6334**	[0.058; 0.455]	Significant effect
Age→AI	−0.0404	0.0460	−0.8857 n.s	[−0.147; 0.029]	Non-significant effect

Note(s): ***p < 0.01 **p < 0.05* p < 0.1 n.s: not significant

Based on n = 9.999 bootstrapping