Table 2

Preferred criteria for assessing the quality of integrated development planning

Perception or viewIDP practitionersCouncilorsWard committeesCommunity development workersOrganized businessTraditional representatives or IndunaWar roomTotals
Stakeholder participation and ownership
(i) Extent to which grassroots community, other stakeholders and municipal council consider and adopt reports of each phase of IDP154323523
(ii) Transparency of process in terms of prioritization of projects and allocation of budget122222213
(iii) Involvement of multistakeholder team in assessment of IDP phases11101116
(iv) Involvement of councilors and ward committees in assessing quality of the IDP01100013
Leadership and accountability
(i) Quality of respective leadership and management provided by mayor (s) and municipal manager (s) in each phase of the IDP421121213
(ii) Local stakeholders to assess the IDP not COGTA assessors032111210
(iii) COGTA and the district municipalities assessment of every phase11100014
(iv) Evidence of power and influence of war rooms in determining the quality of each IDP phase01000124
(v) Level of confidence of organized business that its inputs are used to influence decisions in integrated development planning and budgeting10002003
Impact and outcome-based
(i) Responsiveness of IDP to citizen and stakeholder aspirations and expectations01011205
Compact value chain
(i) Comprehensiveness of checklist or scorecard of deliverables of each phase22110129
Monitoring and evaluation        
(i) Regularity of progress monitoring and reporting on all phases of the IDP222111211
Others        
(i) No need to have formal criteria of the IDP phases00011013

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal