Table 4

Linguistic summaries to establish the relationship of ESG and its individual components with ROA financial performance in Multilatinas

(Q, S, P) in the case of ROA as a financial performance indicatorT
ESGFEW Multilatinas with MODERATE ESG have POOR ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD ESG have POOR ROA0.90
FEW Multilatinas with HIGH ESG have GOOD ROA0.84
FEW Multilatinas with INSUFFICIENT ESG have POOR ROA0.82
FEW Multilatinas with HIGH ESG have POOR ROA0.79
 
EFEW Multilatinas with GOOD E have POOR ROA0.99
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD E have HIGH ROA0.99
FEW Multilatinas with MODERATE E have POOR ROA0.91
FEW Multilatinas with HIGH E have POOR ROA0.90
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD E have GOOD ROA0.82
 
SFEW Multilatinas with MODERATE S have POOR ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with MODERATE S have HIGH ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD S have POOR ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with HIGH S have POOR ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with INSUFFICIENT S have POOR ROA0.86
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD S have HIGH ROA0.84
HALF the Multilatinas with INSUFFICIENT S have LOW ROA0.81
FEW Multilatinas with MODERATE S have GOOD ROA0.81
 
GFEW Multilatinas with MODERATE G have POOR ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD G have HIGH ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with INSUFFICIENT G have GOOD ROA1
FEW Multilatinas with HIGH G have GOOD ROA0.98
FEW Multilatinas with GOOD G have POOR ROA0.98
FEW Multilatinas with INSUFFICIENT G have POOR ROA0.96
FEW Multilatinas with INSUFFICIENT G have HIGH ROA0.91

Source(s): Own elaboration; Data taken from Refinitiv 2014–2022 (as at 14/07/2023)

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal