Table 6 Results of hypotheses testing...

Table 6

Results of hypotheses testing via bootstrapping (direct and specific indirect effects)

Hypothesis	Effect	Path	Coefficient	t statistic	VIF	f-square
H1	Direct	C-HRM → OT	0.6832	15.6***	1.0000	0.875
H2	Direct	C-HRM → INOI	0.1711	1.98*	2.2075	0.026
H3	Direct	OT → INOI	0.2137	2.32*	2.2487	0.041
H4	Mediating	C-HRM → OIT → INOI	0.1460^a	2.18*	–	–
	Direct	DC → INOI	0.4565	4.69***	1.9898	0.207
H5	Moderating	MOD_EFF_DC → INOI	0.1003	2.12*	1.2789	0.023

Hypothesis	Effect	Path	Coefficient	t statistic	VIF	f-square
H1	Direct	C-HRM → OT	0.6832	15.6***	1.0000	0.875
H2	Direct	C-HRM → INOI	0.1711	1.98*	2.2075	0.026
H3	Direct	OT → INOI	0.2137	2.32*	2.2487	0.041
H4	Mediating	C-HRM → OIT → INOI	0.1460^a	2.18*	–	–
	Direct	DC → INOI	0.4565	4.69***	1.9898	0.207
H5	Moderating	MOD_EFF_DC → INOI	0.1003	2.12*	1.2789	0.023

Note(s): a, specific indirect effect; VIF, Variance influence factor; f-Square, effect size; C-HRM, commitment-based human resources management; DC, developmental culture; INOP, inbound open innovation; OT, organizational trust; mod_eff_DC, moderating effect of DC on the C-HRM–INOI relationship. *, **, *** imply that test result is significant at 95%, 99% and 99.9%, respectively

[ViewLarge]