Key professional standards met for the BIA reports (items-1–12)
| Key standards | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Standard report format2. Statement about author’s qualification/experience | 77 76 | 100.0 98.7 |
| 3. Explicit TOR stated | 77 | 100.0 |
| 4. All TOR were addressed | 77 | 100.0 |
| 5. The materials used were listed | 75 | 97.4 |
| 6. Summary of case provided | 74 | 96.1 |
| 7. Report is clearly written | 77 | 100.0 |
| 8. The report is clearly presented | 77 | 100.0 |
| 9. Caveats (including limitations) provided | 76 | 98.7 |
| 10. Appropriate method used and explained | 76 | 98.7 |
| 11. Sources of inferences (mostly/always) articulated | 34 | 44.2 |
| 12. Summary of conclusions provided | 48 | 62.3 |
| 13. Report peer-reviewed14. Full reference list provided to academic/clinical work | 75 63 | 97.4 81.8 |
| 15. Full reference provided to police database cited | 23 | 29.9 |
| 16. Visit to crime scene | 34 | 44.2 |
| Key standards | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Standard report format2. Statement about author’s qualification/experience | 77 | 100.0 |
| 3. Explicit TOR stated | 77 | 100.0 |
| 4. All TOR were addressed | 77 | 100.0 |
| 5. The materials used were listed | 75 | 97.4 |
| 6. Summary of case provided | 74 | 96.1 |
| 7. Report is clearly written | 77 | 100.0 |
| 8. The report is clearly presented | 77 | 100.0 |
| 9. Caveats (including limitations) provided | 76 | 98.7 |
| 10. Appropriate method used and explained | 76 | 98.7 |
| 11. Sources of inferences (mostly/always) articulated | 34 | 44.2 |
| 12. Summary of conclusions provided | 48 | 62.3 |
| 13. Report peer-reviewed14. Full reference list provided to academic/clinical work | 75 | 97.4 |
| 15. Full reference provided to police database cited | 23 | 29.9 |
| 16. Visit to crime scene | 34 | 44.2 |
Note:
TOR = terms of reference
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.