Evaluation sheet
| Scale | Description | ø | X |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10–9 Excellent | Above average student learning and teaching effectiveness; all stages of the research session followed a clear structure; reasonable variation in terms of instructional variety; increased motivation of students; resulted in an above average student outcome; excellent and efficient first-aid course; some minor suggestions | ||
| 8–7 Good | Good student learning and teaching effectiveness; most stages of the research session followed a clear structure; variation in terms of instructional variety; regularly engaged and motivated students; good first-aid course; several minor suggestions | ||
| 6–5 Satisfactory | Sufficient student learning and teaching effectiveness; some stages of the research session followed a clear structure; hardly varied in terms of instructional variety; frequently engaged students; motivated students during fun stages/activities; satisfactory first-aid course; some considerable suggestions | ||
| 4–0 Not Satisfactory | Below-average student learning and teaching effectiveness; predominantly the research session followed no clear structure; no comprehensible variety in terms of instructions; students bored, subchallenged or overchallenged; not satisfactory first-aid course; vast number of suggestions; another coaching course is recommended |
| Scale | Description | ø | X |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10–9 | Above average student learning and teaching effectiveness; all stages of the research session followed a clear structure; reasonable variation in terms of instructional variety; increased motivation of students; resulted in an above average student outcome; excellent and efficient first-aid course; some minor suggestions | ||
| 8–7 | Good student learning and teaching effectiveness; most stages of the research session followed a clear structure; variation in terms of instructional variety; regularly engaged and motivated students; good first-aid course; several minor suggestions | ||
| 6–5 | Sufficient student learning and teaching effectiveness; some stages of the research session followed a clear structure; hardly varied in terms of instructional variety; frequently engaged students; motivated students during fun stages/activities; satisfactory first-aid course; some considerable suggestions | ||
| 4–0 | Below-average student learning and teaching effectiveness; predominantly the research session followed no clear structure; no comprehensible variety in terms of instructions; students bored, subchallenged or overchallenged; not satisfactory first-aid course; vast number of suggestions; another coaching course is recommended |
Source(s): Table created by Thomas Andreas Ogradnig
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.