Summary of team composition, goal and challenges
| Team | Team composition | Goal | Biggest perceived challenge(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midwestern College | 3 members
| Improve coordination and communication | Rotating chairs in departments; sustainability challenges |
| Western College | 3 members
| Reduce silos and improve communication across the institution | Projects tied to individual passions rather than roles; lack of time and people |
| Southern R2: MSI | 5 members
| Improve mentoring across institution, including mentoring for faculty | Lack of formalization of mentoring particularly for faculty; lack of consistency in student experience |
| Southern R1: MSI | 3 members
| Generating a comprehensive mentoring plan to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort | Great deal of variability in leadership and initiative across departments; lack of communication |
| Eastern R1 | 4 members
| Supporting students who are unaffiliated with signature programs; improve communication | Silos; lack of mentoring available for students unaffiliated with signature programs |
| Western R1 | 3 members
| Lack of coordination and tracking undergraduate mentoring activities | Strengthening mentoring across institution over time for undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty |
| Team | Team composition | Goal | Biggest perceived challenge(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midwestern College | 3 members 1 biological science faculty serving as a lead for major grant 1 administrator from advising 1 staff member supporting career development | Improve coordination and communication | Rotating chairs in departments; sustainability challenges |
| Western College | 3 members 1 administrator from faculty affairs 1 faculty from computer science 1 staff from DEI supporting student mentoring | Reduce silos and improve communication across the institution | Projects tied to individual passions rather than roles; lack of time and people |
| Southern R2: MSI | 5 members 3 faculty from across the institution 1 science administrator 1 administrator from new student programs | Improve mentoring across institution, including mentoring for faculty | Lack of formalization of mentoring particularly for faculty; lack of consistency in student experience |
| Southern R1: MSI | 3 members 1 biological science faculty 1 computer science faculty, both with student and faculty of colour mentoring experience 1 administrator in STEM | Generating a comprehensive mentoring plan to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort | Great deal of variability in leadership and initiative across departments; lack of communication |
| Eastern R1 | 4 members 2 staff from a signature mentoring program for STEM students of colour 1 administrator from academic affairs 1 staff from student affairs involved in residential–academic programs | Supporting students who are unaffiliated with signature programs; improve communication | Silos; lack of mentoring available for students unaffiliated with signature programs |
| Western R1 | 3 members 2 administrators and 1 staff from STEM-focussed office including partnerships and undergraduate research | Lack of coordination and tracking undergraduate mentoring activities | Strengthening mentoring across institution over time for undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty |
Note(s): DEI = [Diversity, Equity and Inclusion]; R2 = [Research 2 University]; MSI = [Minority-Serving Institution]; R1 = [Research 1 University]; STEM = [Science, Technology, Engineering, Math]
Source(s): Created by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.