Description of the steps of the thematic analysis
| Step number | Description of the steps of the thematic analysis |
|---|---|
| Step 1 | We read through the transcribed materials from the student youth’s discussion multiple times, focusing on poignant statements and interesting ideas expressed by the students |
| Step 2 | In the transcribed Word documents, we identified recurring ideas of interest using systematic colour codes |
| Step 3 | Reviewing the colour coded documents, we compiled similar student statements and together discussed how these could form primary themes (level 1) as well as sub themes (level 2). Sub-themes we carefully extended out of the primary themes to retain coherence in the thematic analysis. Using comparative readings, we considered alternative themes and how the sub-themes related to each other |
| Step 4 | Three primary themes of the students were identified, biomedical, social-cultural and sensory value-knowledges (level 1 themes). These were further reviewed and refined in terms of nuance into a set of four sub-themes for each primary theme (level 2 themes). Drawn together these themes and sub-themes formed a thematic “map” for our further analysis highlighted in illustration 2. As we moved forward in the subsequent steps of our analysis we drew on this map to position our results |
| Step 5 | As part of this step, primary and sub-themes were re-checked against the empirical materials to make certain that no important aspects of the student’s discussions were unaccounted for in the themes |
| Step 6 | To provide readers with convincing arguments for our analysis, illustrative examples were selected out of the coded empirical materials. These were aimed at justifying the primary and sub-themes and to support our analytical results and conclusions. Throughout this final step, the paper’s aim and research questions guided the analysis and writing of the analytical report |
| Step number | Description of the steps of the thematic analysis |
|---|---|
| Step 1 | We read through the transcribed materials from the student youth’s discussion multiple times, focusing on poignant statements and interesting ideas expressed by the students |
| Step 2 | In the transcribed Word documents, we identified recurring ideas of interest using systematic colour codes |
| Step 3 | Reviewing the colour coded documents, we compiled similar student statements and together discussed how these could form primary themes (level 1) as well as sub themes (level 2). Sub-themes we carefully extended out of the primary themes to retain coherence in the thematic analysis. Using comparative readings, we considered alternative themes and how the sub-themes related to each other |
| Step 4 | Three primary themes of the students were identified, biomedical, social-cultural and sensory value-knowledges (level 1 themes). These were further reviewed and refined in terms of nuance into a set of four sub-themes for each primary theme (level 2 themes). Drawn together these themes and sub-themes formed a thematic “map” for our further analysis highlighted in illustration 2. As we moved forward in the subsequent steps of our analysis we drew on this map to position our results |
| Step 5 | As part of this step, primary and sub-themes were re-checked against the empirical materials to make certain that no important aspects of the student’s discussions were unaccounted for in the themes |
| Step 6 | To provide readers with convincing arguments for our analysis, illustrative examples were selected out of the coded empirical materials. These were aimed at justifying the primary and sub-themes and to support our analytical results and conclusions. Throughout this final step, the paper’s aim and research questions guided the analysis and writing of the analytical report |
Source(s): Authors' own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.