Table 1.

Outline of coordination schemes

ContractsProducerRetailerSupply chain
AdvantageDisadvantageAdvantageDisadvantageAdvantageDisadvantage
Case 0 (No coordination)Facing lowest riskLow order quantity from the retailer sideHigh profit marginHigh riskVirtually, there is no overall advantage supply chain (SC)Expected demand for the product decreases
Free to set the wholesale price of the product to maximize own profitHigh inventory carrying costFree to set a retail price to maximize own profitLow product demand due to high price Low supply chain profit
High profit margin   High product cost
Case 1 (Whole sale price contracts)Low riskLow or zero profitCapture maximum profit share of the SCHigh riskProfit increasesBoth members of SC did not benefit equally, so the SC was not coordinated
High order quantity from the retailer Can able to order a greater number of units of the productInventory carrying cost increasesEfficiency of the SC increases 
    Double marginalization reduces 
Case 2 (Buy back contracts)Profit increasesRisk sharing increaseReduces risk of overstockingInventory carrying cost increasesProfit increases/overall cost reductionWin-win situation is not achievable
Order quantity increases Increases salvage value per unit in the form of payback Product availability increasesMay increase the retail price
 Increases the level of product availabilityBetter coordination between producer and retailer 
Case 3 (Revenue Sharing Contracts)Profit increasesProblem to decide the percentage of profit sharingLower wholesale priceInventory carrying cost increasesProfit increases/overall cost reductionWin-win situation is not achievable
Encourages retailer to order larger quantitiesApplicability is limited to high value productsProfit increasesDue to the high cost of the product order quantity is lessBetter coordination between producer and retailer 
More space for negotiation Increases the level of product availability   
  Lower risk sharing   
Case 4 (Markdown money policy)Significant percentage increase in earningsRequire more careful deliberationNet income increasesInventory carrying cost increasesProfit increases/overall cost reductionMore complicated than wholesale price contract
Encourages retailer to order larger quantities Increases the degree of product accessibilityHigh risk sharingSimplicity and ease of implementation 
Can use preannounce d markdown pricing to sell finite amount of product   Significant effect on pushing order quantity up 
Case 5 (Sale rebate contracts)Net income increasesDue to rebate net income may decreaseOrdering cost reducesTo avoid significant markdown under stocking may be set upBetter marketing of merchandiseWin-win situation is not manageable
This reduces the risk factors Net income increasesThe high sales effort to receive a sales rebateEnhance the supply chain performance 
Encourages retailer to order larger quantities Increases the level of product availability   
Push retailer to sell a greater number of units Lower risk   

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal