Table 3 Results of the influence... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Results of the influence analysis

Top-level network	Parameter	Communities of practice	Enterprise social networks	Mixed-aged teams	Storytelling
Original values	0.5	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Commitment: upper	0.9	0.4411	0.1318	0.2869	0.1401
Reward management: upper	0.9	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Work satisfaction: upper	0.9	0.4396	0.1075	0.0906	0.3621
Organizational culture: upper	0.9	0.4202	0.1203	0.0831	0.3762
Size: upper	0.9	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Technology: upper	0.9	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Commitment: lower	0.1	0.4265	0.1171	0.0927	0.3636
Reward management: lower	0.1	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Work satisfaction: lower	0.1	0.4293	0.1250	0.1697	0.2759
Organizational culture: lower	0.1	0.4400	0.1198	0.1880	0.2521
Size: lower	0.1	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Technology: lower	0.1	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007

Top-level network	Parameter	Communities of practice	Enterprise social networks	Mixed-aged teams	Storytelling
Original values	0.5	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Commitment: upper	0.9	0.4411	0.1318	0.2869	0.1401
Reward management: upper	0.9	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Work satisfaction: upper	0.9	0.4396	0.1075	0.0906	0.3621
Organizational culture: upper	0.9	0.4202	0.1203	0.0831	0.3762
Size: upper	0.9	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Technology: upper	0.9	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Commitment: lower	0.1	0.4265	0.1171	0.0927	0.3636
Reward management: lower	0.1	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Work satisfaction: lower	0.1	0.4293	0.1250	0.1697	0.2759
Organizational culture: lower	0.1	0.4400	0.1198	0.1880	0.2521
Size: lower	0.1	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007
Technology: lower	0.1	0.4316	0.1204	0.1471	0.3007

Note(s): In italics appear the elements that highlight the changes in the ranking

Source(s): Authors' own work