Results of Two-Step Difference GMM Analysis on the relationship between audit quality, specifically Audit Tenure (AT), Audit Fees (AF), and Audit Size (B5), And Financial Statement Fraud (FR)
| Variables | Coefficient | p Value |
|---|---|---|
| FR L1 | −6.338 | 0.000*** |
| AT | −0.532 | 0.005*** |
| AF | 0.963 | 0.062* |
| Big5 | −1.735 | 0.016** |
| PROF | −4.274 | 0.032** |
| LEVE | 0.164 | 0.023** |
| SIZE | −9.598 | 0.001*** |
| ROA | 5.323 | 0.000*** |
| Arellano-Bond test (AR (2)) | 0.662 | |
| Hansen Test | 0.296 |
| Variables | Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| −6.338 | 0.000*** | |
| −0.532 | 0.005*** | |
| 0.963 | 0.062* | |
| −1.735 | 0.016** | |
| −4.274 | 0.032** | |
| 0.164 | 0.023** | |
| −9.598 | 0.001*** | |
| 5.323 | 0.000*** | |
| Arellano-Bond test (AR (2)) | 0.662 | |
| Hansen Test | 0.296 |
Note(s):
Note(s): *, **, *** represent significance at the 10, 5 and 1 percent levels, respectively. FR is Dechow f-value, AT is auditor period; Big5 is five big audit firms (Deloitte, KPMG, Enrst and Young, PWC, BDO); AF is the amount paid for the auditor service; Prof is profitability measured by net profit margin; Lev is a leverage of the company is measured by total assets divided by total liabilities of the company; Size that is measured by the total assets of the company; ROA is return on assets is measured by income continuing operation divided by total assets
Source(s): Table created by authors