Table 4 Structural model and hypothesis...

Table 4

Structural model and hypothesis testing result

Hypothesis	STD beta	STD error	t-values	p-values	2.5%	97.5%	Significance (p < 0.05)	f²
H1: COST → BI	−0.147	0.036	4.050	0.000	−0.217	−0.075	Supported	0.081
H2: RELA → BI	0.120	0.054	2.206	0.027	0.021	0.231	Supported	0.031
H3: COMPEX → BI	−0.161	0.050	3.229	0.001	0.067	0.262	Supported	0.088
H4: COMPAT → BI	0.104	0.042	2.489	0.013	0.017	0.182	Supported	0.029
H5: TRI → BI	0.105	0.036	2.931	0.003	0.032	0.173	Supported	0.038
H6: OBS → BI	0.236	0.057	4.141	0.000	0.134	0.358	Supported	0.139
H7: CP → BI	0.173	0.037	4.625	0.000	0.098	0.246	Supported	0.100
H8: CUST → BI	0.237	0.065	3.640	0.000	0.105	0.357	Supported	0.114
H9: ES → BI	0.044	0.034	1.291	0.197	−0.024	0.111	NS	0.007
H10: VA → BI	0.106	0.040	2.656	0.008	0.027	0.182	Supported	0.028

Hypothesis	STD beta	STD error	t-values	p-values	2.5%	97.5%	Significance (p < 0.05)	f²
H1: COST → BI	−0.147	0.036	4.050	0.000	−0.217	−0.075	Supported	0.081
H2: RELA → BI	0.120	0.054	2.206	0.027	0.021	0.231	Supported	0.031
H3: COMPEX → BI	−0.161	0.050	3.229	0.001	0.067	0.262	Supported	0.088
H4: COMPAT → BI	0.104	0.042	2.489	0.013	0.017	0.182	Supported	0.029
H5: TRI → BI	0.105	0.036	2.931	0.003	0.032	0.173	Supported	0.038
H6: OBS → BI	0.236	0.057	4.141	0.000	0.134	0.358	Supported	0.139
H7: CP → BI	0.173	0.037	4.625	0.000	0.098	0.246	Supported	0.100
H8: CUST → BI	0.237	0.065	3.640	0.000	0.105	0.357	Supported	0.114
H9: ES → BI	0.044	0.034	1.291	0.197	−0.024	0.111	NS	0.007
H10: VA → BI	0.106	0.040	2.656	0.008	0.027	0.182	Supported	0.028

Note(s): BI = behavioral intention, CP = competitive pressure, CUST = customer pressure, ES = external support, PC = perceived cost, Compex = complexity, Compat = compatibility, Tri = trialability, Obs = observability, Rela = relative advantage, VA = value alignment

[ViewLarge]