Table 1. Calculation results of average...

Table 1.

Calculation results of average input–output relative efficiency of ten representative provinces (cities) from 2011 to 2020

Province (city)	Crste	Ranking	Vrste	Ranking	Scale	Ranking
Beijing	0.8338	10	0.9132	8	0.9131	7
Guangdong	0.8907	6	0.9812	5	0.909	8
Jiangsu	0.9995	2	0.9997	2	0.9998	2
Zhejiang	0.8902	7	0.8995	10	0.9896	3
Shanghai	0.8815	8	0.9052	9	0.9742	5
Shandong	1	1	1	1	1	1
Hubei	0.955	3	0.9763	6	0.9773	4
Anhui	0.8995	4	0.9726	7	0.9243	6
Sichuan	0.876	9	0.9967	3	0.8789	10
Tianjin	0.892	5	0.989	4	0.9028	9

Province (city)	Crste	Ranking	Vrste	Ranking	Scale	Ranking
Beijing	0.8338	10	0.9132	8	0.9131	7
Guangdong	0.8907	6	0.9812	5	0.909	8
Jiangsu	0.9995	2	0.9997	2	0.9998	2
Zhejiang	0.8902	7	0.8995	10	0.9896	3
Shanghai	0.8815	8	0.9052	9	0.9742	5
Shandong	1	1	1	1	1	1
Hubei	0.955	3	0.9763	6	0.9773	4
Anhui	0.8995	4	0.9726	7	0.9243	6
Sichuan	0.876	9	0.9967	3	0.8789	10
Tianjin	0.892	5	0.989	4	0.9028	9

Notes:

“Crste” represents the comprehensive technical efficiency level, “Vrste” represents the pure technical efficiency level, “Scale” represents the scale efficiency level. The same below

Source: Table by authors

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable