Structure of staffing of the sample subsidiaries in terms of international experience
| R&D Laboratories | Type of staffing | % | Export intensity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locally Integrated Laboratories (LILs) | Employees with international experience | 53% | 69% |
| Management | 41% | ||
| Technical know how | 64% | ||
| Internationally interdependent Laboratories (IILs) | Employees with international experience | 56% 39% 72% | 88% |
| Management | |||
| Technical know how | |||
| Support Laboratories (SLs) | Employees with international experience | 22% | 12% |
| Management | 25% | ||
| Technical know how | 20% | ||
| No | Employees with international experience | 9% | 16% |
| R&D | Management | 13% | |
| Laboratories (NoLabs) | Technical know how | 4% |
| R&D | Type of staffing | % | Export intensity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locally Integrated Laboratories (LILs) | Employees with international experience | 53% | 69% |
| Internationally interdependent Laboratories (IILs) | Employees with international experience | 56% | 88% |
| Support Laboratories (SLs) | Employees with international experience | 22% | 12% |
| No | Employees with international experience | 9% | 16% |
| R&D | |||
| Laboratories (NoLabs) |
Source(s): Table created by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.