Table 1.

Identity-fit support mechanisms

Support mechanismExplanationAuthors
Organizational level
Diagnostic control useDiagnostic controls guide behaviors and provide feedback to facilitate employee learning (single loop). They are intended to give employees structure that influence feelings of competence. Thereby, the use of diagnostic controls reduces role ambiguity by setting clear goalsMarginson et al. (2014), Speklé et al. (2017), Simons (1995) 
Interactive control useInteractive control use expands opportunity-seeking and learning throughout the organization and helps to reduce role ambiguity through face-to-face interactions (double loop) and encourage discussion and debateByrne and Pierce (2018), Marginson et al. (2014), Simons (1995), Widener (2007) 
Boundary control useBoundary controls provide structure and set requirements on management accountants behavior to focus the attention to critical operations which prevent overloaded expectations regarding their roleAdler and Chen (2011), Byrne and Pierce (2018) 
Beliefs control useBeliefs controls signal core values to management accountants, in order to inspire and motivate them to take initiative in searching for opportunities, making decisions and devising solutions to problems consistent with the organization’s values and encourage self-determinationDeci (1971), Mundy (2010), Simons (1995) 
Organizational structureContinuum from mechanic to organic structures whereas mechanistic structures are characterized by centralized decision making and authority. Organic structures are characterized by decentralized decision making, flexibility and self-determinationBedford et al. (2016), Covin et al. (2001), Deci (1971), Lepistö et al. (2018) 
Job clarityClear expectations about tasks have an important impact on individual identities. A balance towards the desired identity is mostly regulated by upper echelons that need to clarify and legitimize the tasks of the management accountantByrne and Pierce (2018), Gartenberg et al. (2019), Goretzki et al. (2013), Järvinen (2009) 
Group level
Group cultureCo-worker related norms are most effective to influence employees’ actions. The culture within organizational groups is especially important as norms within groups tend to govern behavior, attitudes and the emotional dimensions of workByrne and Pierce (2007), Kahn (1990), Lepistö et al. (2018), May et al. (2004) 
Leader-member relationship quality (LMX)Individuals feel safer to engage themselves more fully, try out novel ways of doing things, discuss mistakes and learn from these behaviors when they are in supportive relationship with their supervisorsByrne and Pierce (2018), Goretzki and Messner (2019), May et al. (2004) 
Psychological safetyPsychological safety is defined as the feeling to be able to show oneself without fear of negative consequences to self-image, status, or career (in a group)Ashford et al. (1998), Edmondson (1999), Kahn (1990), May et al. (2004), Morales and Lambert (2013) 
Source: Authors’ own création

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Register

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period.