Overview of studies empirically researching drivers and barriers of smart product (non-)adoption
| Source | Research object | Dependent variable | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schweitzer and Van den Hende (2016) | Smart household objects | Adoption intention | Autonomous smart products are perceived as more disempowering than semi-autonomous smart products; adoption likelihood is negatively affected |
| Mani and Chouk (2017) | Smartwatch | Resistance | The results show that uselessness, price, intrusiveness, novelty, and self-efficacy have an impact on consumer resistance to smart products. In addition, privacy concerns affect intrusiveness and dependency affects privacy concerns |
| Kowalczuk (2018) | Smart speaker | Behavioral intention | Besides ease of use and usefulness, the quality and diversity of a system, its enjoyment, consumer's technology optimism, and risk strongly affect the acceptance of smart speakers, with enjoyment having the strongest effect |
| Hubert et al. (2019) | Smart home | Behavioral intention | The study highlights that compatibility and usefulness as the foremost determinants of use intention, with usefulness also mediating the effect of risk perception |
| Bölen (2020) | Smartwatch | Continuance intention | Bölen finds a significant positive effect of usefulness on attitude toward sports wearables and attitude of usage intention |
| Kim and Moon (2023) | Smart washing machine | Acceptance intention | While for full-time housewives especially usefulness significantly influences acceptance for employed females it is both usefulness and enjoyment |
| Li et al. (2023) | Smartphones, smartwatches | Adoption intention | Smart products can improve consumers' perceptions of the four motivations of meaning, capability, autonomy, and influence, which activate consumers' psychological empowerment and thus improve consumers' adoption intention |
| Lucia-Palacios and Perez-Lopez (2023) | Smart home voice assistant | Repurchase intention | Usefulness, coolness and interactivity show positive mediating effects between autonomy and experience, while intrusiveness has a negative mediating effect. The better the consumer's experience, the greater the repurchase intention |
| Source | Research object | Dependent variable | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart household objects | Adoption intention | Autonomous smart products are perceived as more | |
| Smartwatch | Resistance | The results show that uselessness, price, | |
| Smart speaker | Behavioral intention | Besides ease of use and | |
| Smart home | Behavioral intention | The study highlights that compatibility and | |
| Smartwatch | Continuance intention | Bölen finds a significant positive effect of | |
| Smart washing machine | Acceptance intention | While for full-time housewives especially | |
| Smartphones, smartwatches | Adoption intention | Smart products can improve consumers' perceptions of the four motivations of meaning, capability, autonomy, and influence, which activate consumers' | |
| Smart home voice assistant | Repurchase intention |
Note(s): Selected studies. The studies were chosen because of their relevance to the research objective
Source(s): Table created by the authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.