Assessment of indirect effects on consumer-level
| Mediation paths | ß (std.) | SE | 95%-CI (std) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interval low | Interval high | |||
| Dependent variable: usage intention | ||||
| Actuation via enjoyment | 0.037** | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.066 |
| Actuation via usefulness | 0.042*** | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.069 |
| Actuation via intrusiveness | 0.002 | 0.003 | −0.003 | 0.007 |
| Actuation via control | −0.001 | 0.002 | −0.002 | 0.004 |
| Dynamism via enjoyment | 0.060*** | 0.017 | 0.025 | 0.094 |
| Dynamism via usefulness | 0.039*** | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.067 |
| Dynamism via intrusiveness | 0.005 | 0.003 | −0.002 | 0.001 |
| Dynamism via control | −0.004 | 0.005 | −0.005 | 0.014 |
| Awareness via enjoyment | −0.047*** | 0.016 | −0.077 | −0.016 |
| Awareness via usefulness | −0.034*** | 0.013 | −0.059 | −0.009 |
| Awareness via intrusiveness | −0.011* | 0.003 | −0.023 | −0.000 |
| Awareness via control | 0.004 | 0.003 | −0.013 | 0.005 |
| Connectivity via enjoyment | 0.039*** | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.064 |
| Connectivity via usefulness | 0.045*** | 0.012 | 0.021 | 0.068 |
| Connectivity via intrusiveness | 0.005 | 0.003 | −0.001 | 0.001 |
| Connectivity via control | −0.002 | 0.003 | −0.003 | 0.008 |
| Humanlike interaction via enjoyment | 0.124*** | 0.020 | 0.084 | 0.164 |
| Humanlike interaction via usefulness | 0.093*** | 0.018 | 0.058 | 0.129 |
| Humanlike interaction via intrusiveness | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.025 |
| Humanlike interaction via control | −0.010 | 0.011 | −0.012 | 0.032 |
| Mediation paths | ß (std.) | SE | 95%-CI (std) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interval low | Interval high | |||
| Dependent variable: usage intention | ||||
| Actuation via enjoyment | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.066 | |
| Actuation via usefulness | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.069 | |
| Actuation via intrusiveness | 0.002 | 0.003 | −0.003 | 0.007 |
| Actuation via control | −0.001 | 0.002 | −0.002 | 0.004 |
| Dynamism via enjoyment | 0.017 | 0.025 | 0.094 | |
| Dynamism via usefulness | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.067 | |
| Dynamism via intrusiveness | 0.005 | 0.003 | −0.002 | 0.001 |
| Dynamism via control | −0.004 | 0.005 | −0.005 | 0.014 |
| Awareness via enjoyment | 0.016 | −0.077 | −0.016 | |
| Awareness via usefulness | 0.013 | −0.059 | −0.009 | |
| Awareness via intrusiveness | 0.003 | −0.023 | −0.000 | |
| Awareness via control | 0.004 | 0.003 | −0.013 | 0.005 |
| Connectivity via enjoyment | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.064 | |
| Connectivity via usefulness | 0.012 | 0.021 | 0.068 | |
| Connectivity via intrusiveness | 0.005 | 0.003 | −0.001 | 0.001 |
| Connectivity via control | −0.002 | 0.003 | −0.003 | 0.008 |
| Humanlike interaction via enjoyment | 0.020 | 0.084 | 0.164 | |
| Humanlike interaction via usefulness | 0.018 | 0.058 | 0.129 | |
| Humanlike interaction via intrusiveness | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.025 |
| Humanlike interaction via control | −0.010 | 0.011 | −0.012 | 0.032 |
Note(s): Global fit indices: CFI 0.968; TLI 0.962; RMSEA 0.031; SRMR 0.042
N = 1,170; significance according to confidence intervals determined in RMediation; significant results at p < 0.01 (***) and p < 0.05 (**) are in underline, results p < 0.10 (*) are in italics and nonsignificant effects (n.s.) are in normal font
Source(s): Table created by the authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.