NVivo thematic classification
| Categories | Codes (references) | Sub-codes |
|---|---|---|
| Perception on the use of SBT (56) | 1. Affordability (14) | • Cheaper than brick and block |
| 2. Sustainability (22) | • Thermally efficient | |
| • Reduced CO2 emission | ||
| • Improved occupant health | ||
| 3. Job creation (8) | • Labour intensive | |
| • Easy to learn | ||
| 4. Earthquake resistant (6) | ||
| 5. Fire resistance (6) | ||
| The barrier to the use of SBT in South Africa (48) | 1. Social acceptance (17) | |
| 2. Support from Government (11) | • Building codes and regulation | |
| • Scarcity of sand in south Africa | ||
| 3. Professional expertise (9) | ||
| 4. Preference for brick and block (7) | ||
| 5. Access to finance (4) | ||
| Strategies to enhance the social acceptance of SBT (36) | 1. Adequate research on sandbag performance (13) 2. Awareness (12) 3. Building Sandbag prototype across cities (6) 4. Training (5) |
| Categories | Codes (references) | Sub-codes |
|---|---|---|
| Perception on the use of SBT (56) | 1. Affordability (14) | • Cheaper than brick and block |
| 2. Sustainability (22) | • Thermally efficient | |
| • Reduced CO2 emission | ||
| • Improved occupant health | ||
| 3. Job creation (8) | • Labour intensive | |
| • Easy to learn | ||
| 4. Earthquake resistant (6) | ||
| 5. Fire resistance (6) | ||
| The barrier to the use of SBT in South Africa (48) | 1. Social acceptance (17) | |
| 2. Support from Government (11) | • Building codes and regulation | |
| • Scarcity of sand in south Africa | ||
| 3. Professional expertise (9) | ||
| 4. Preference for brick and block (7) | ||
| 5. Access to finance (4) | ||
| Strategies to enhance the social acceptance of SBT (36) | 1. Adequate research on sandbag performance (13) |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.