Table 5 Test of hypothesis Beta... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Test of hypothesis

Beta coefficient	Baseline model		Mediation model
Disruption orientation → SC resilience (H1)	0.533*** (9.174) [0.425, 0.651]		0.530*** (9.058) [0.420, 0.648]
SC resilience → Disruption impact (H2)	0.482*** (8.327) [0.370, 0.599]		0.438*** (5.481) [0.279, 0.592]
Disruption orientation → Disruption impact (H3)			0.085 (1.029) [−0.069, 0.256]
Firm age → Disruption impact (CV)	0.226** (3.670) [0.099, 0.341]		0.226** (3.705) [0.100, 0.338]
Firm size → Disruption impact (CV)	0.166** (2.568) [0.037, 0.292]		0.162** (2.515) [0.033, 0.288]
R²	R²	Adj. R²	R²	Adj. R²
SC resilience	0.284	0.281	0.281	0.277
Disruption impact	0.294	0.284	0.301	0.288
*Overall fit of the estimated model*	Value	HI₉₉	Value	HI₉₉
*SRMR*	0.056	0.061	0.055	0.056
*d_ULS*	0.476	0.569	0.457	0.488
*d_G*	0.130	0.157	0.128	0.155
*Effect size (f²)*	f²
Disruption orientation → SC resilience (H1)	0.397		0.390
SC resilience → Disruption impact (H2)	0.322		0.193
Disruption orientation → Disruption impact			0.007
Firm age → Disruption impact (CV)	0.060		0.061
Firm size → Disruption impact (CV)	0.033		0.032

Beta coefficient	Baseline model		Mediation model
Disruption orientation → SC resilience (H1)	0.533*** (9.174)[0.425, 0.651]		0.530*** (9.058)[0.420, 0.648]
SC resilience → Disruption impact (H2)	0.482*** (8.327)[0.370, 0.599]		0.438*** (5.481)[0.279, 0.592]
Disruption orientation → Disruption impact (H3)			0.085 (1.029)[−0.069, 0.256]
Firm age → Disruption impact (CV)	0.226** (3.670)[0.099, 0.341]		0.226**(3.705) [0.100, 0.338]
Firm size → Disruption impact (CV)	0.166** (2.568)[0.037, 0.292]		0.162** (2.515)[0.033, 0.288]
R²	R²	Adj. R²	R²	Adj. R²
SC resilience	0.284	0.281	0.281	0.277
Disruption impact	0.294	0.284	0.301	0.288
Overall fit of the estimated model	Value	HI₉₉	Value	HI₉₉
SRMR	0.056	0.061	0.055	0.056
d_ULS	0.476	0.569	0.457	0.488
d_G	0.130	0.157	0.128	0.155
Effect size (f²)	f²
Disruption orientation → SC resilience (H1)	0.397		0.390
SC resilience → Disruption impact (H2)	0.322		0.193
Disruption orientation → Disruption impact			0.007
Firm age → Disruption impact (CV)	0.060		0.061
Firm size → Disruption impact (CV)	0.033		0.032

Notes:

t-values in parentheses. Bootstrapping 95% confidence interval bias-corrected in square bracket (based on n = 4,999 subsamples);

*p < 0.05,

**p < 0.01;

***p < 0.001

Source: Authors’ own work