2015 agenda consultation
| Number of CL | % | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total of CL received | 119 | 100 | |
| CL addressing the topic of Pollutant Pricing Mechanism | 51 | 100 | |
| Panel A. Type of respondents | |||
| Accounting Firm | 9 | 18 | 8 |
| Accounting Professional body | 12 | 24 | 10 |
| Accounting Standard-setters | 18 | 35 | 35 |
| Preparers | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Users and market regulators | 7 | 14 | 78 |
| Others (ONG, Academics) | 3 | 6 | 25 |
| Panel B. Analyses of responses | |||
| High importance (level 3) | 13 | 25 | 11 |
| Low and Medium importance (levels 1 and 2) | 31 | 61 | 26 |
| No explicit ranking | 7 | 14 | 6 |
| Total | 51 | 100 | 43 |
| Number of CL | % | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total of CL received | 119 | 100 | |
| CL addressing the topic of Pollutant Pricing Mechanism | 51 | 100 | |
| Accounting Firm | 9 | 18 | 8 |
| Accounting Professional body | 12 | 24 | 10 |
| Accounting Standard-setters | 18 | 35 | 35 |
| Preparers | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Users and market regulators | 7 | 14 | 78 |
| Others (ONG, Academics) | 3 | 6 | 25 |
| High importance (level 3) | 13 | 25 | 11 |
| Low and Medium importance (levels 1 and 2) | 31 | 61 | 26 |
| No explicit ranking | 7 | 14 | 6 |
| Total | 51 | 100 | 43 |